ArticleScientific reports2025
Association of body mass index with clinicopathological features among patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with surgery: a retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the potential association between body mass index (BMI) and the clinicopathological features of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). We retrospectively analyzed data from 2541 patients who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy for renal masses between 2013 and 2023 in a single institution. Patients were divided into normal-weight, overweight, and obese groups based on the Chinese BMI classification. Clinicopathological features, including pathologic tumor size, pathologic T (pT) stage, Fuhrman grade or WHO/ISUP grade, renal capsular invasion, perirenal fat or renal sinus fat invasion, and vein cancerous embolus were compared among the groups using Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA for normally distributed continuous variables, and the chi-square or Fisher's test for categorical variables. A total of 2541 ccRCC patients having a median BMI of 24.9 (interquartile range 22.7-27.0) were evaluated. No significant association was found between the pathological tumor diameter and BMI among the normal-weight, overweight, and obese groups (normal-weight vs. overweight, p = 0.31; normal-weight vs. obese, p = 0.21). There was no statistical difference in pT stage (normal-weight vs. overweight, p = 0.28; normal-weight vs. obese, p = 0.23). No statistically significant difference was observed in the distribution of Fuhrman/ISUP grade (p = 0.12), proportion of patients with renal capsular invasion (p = 0.49), perirenal fat or renal sinus fat invasion (p = 1.00), and vein cancerous embolus (p = 0.11) between the normal-weight and overweight groups. However, patients in the obese group tended to have low Fuhrman or WHO/ISUP grades (p < 0.001), and decreased rates of renal capsular invasion (p < 0.05), perirenal fat or renal sinus fat invasion (p < 0.05), and vein cancerous embolus (p < 0.05). Obesity was associated with less aggressive pathological features such as low tumor nuclear grade, low rate of renal capsular invasion, perirenal fat or renal sinus fat invasion, and vein cancerous embolus. This finding may provide clinicopathological evidence and explanations for the "obesity paradox" of RCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.