Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748396›Full record

ArticleMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2025

Safety of antenatal breastmilk expression from week 34 of pregnancy: a randomized controlled pilot study (The Express-MOM study).

Marie Bendix Simonsen, Sarah Bjerrum Bentzen, Sören Möller, Kristina Garne Holm, Christina Anne Vinter, Gitte Zachariassen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05516199 (Antenatal Breastmilk Expression From Week 34 of Gestation Safety in Pregnancy and Benefits for the Newborn Infant), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05516199 nacompletednot on this map

Antenatal Breastmilk Expression From Week 34 of Gestation Safety in Pregnancy and Benefits for the Newborn Infant: A Pilot Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsBreastmilk Expression, Collection, Breastmilk, Breastfeeding, HealthyArmsAntenatal breastmilk expression, Breastfeeding consultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Antenatal colostrum expression: are we interfering with nature?International breastfeeding journal · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marie Bendix SimonsenHans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. marie.bendix.simonsen@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8728-1762
Sarah Bjerrum BentzenHans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5722-4737
Sören MöllerDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0858-4269
Kristina Garne HolmHans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2730-1167
Christina Anne VinterDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5084-6053
Gitte ZachariassenHans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4440-2362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMother's own milk (MOM) is important as the first nutrition for preterm infants, but mothers often struggle to initiate milk production right after preterm birth. If antenatal breastmilk expression (aBME) does not induce preterm labor when performed before term age, it could promote nutrition with MOM right after preterm birth. In this pilot study, we aimed to investigate whether aBME induces preterm labor among healthy nulliparous women from week 34 of pregnancy, to examine if aBME promotes the availability of MOM right after birth and affects breastfeeding outcomes.

methodsWomen were randomized to aBME (10 min 2 × daily) from week 34 of pregnancy until birth or to the control group. Both groups had a breastfeeding consultation between week 33 and 34 of pregnancy and were followed until eight weeks after birth. The primary outcome was gestational age (GA) at birth. Secondary outcomes were the availability of MOM and exclusive breastfeeding rates from 24 h to eight weeks after birth. Ranksum test and a posterior plot for the probability of non-inferiority were applied to the primary outcome. The availability of MOM is reported as medians and IQR. Breastfeeding outcomes were analyzed with mixed effects logistic regression.

resultsOne hundred forty-four pregnant women were eligible for participation, 51 were excluded, and 33 declined participation/did not answer inclusion phone calls. 60 women were included and randomized. Primary outcome data were available in 55 women (28 in intervention, 27 in control). We found no difference in GA at birth between the two groups: median (IQR), 40 + 1(39 + 5:41 + 2) in intervention vs. 40 + 2 (39 + 4:41 + 1) in control, p = 0.98. Antenatal expressed MOM was available at birth in most women in the intervention group (23/28, 82%), with a median of 52 mL during pregnancy. There was no statistically significant difference in breastfeeding outcomes. No adverse events were reported.

conclusionsaBME performed by healthy nulliparous women from gestational week 34 did not induce preterm labor. In most women in the intervention group, MOM was available right after birth. The study results provide the basis for a trial among women at high risk for preterm birth.

trial registrationCLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT05516199).

Indexed as

Antenatal breastmilk expressionBreastfeedingMother’s own milkPreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID39748396
PMCPMC11697818

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.