ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025
Electrical storm in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease treated with radiofrequency ablation and subsequent serious complication of implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Charcot-Marie-Tooth is the most common inherited neuromuscular disorder. Rarely, it can be associated with heart failure and various arrhythmic disturbances. This case illustrates the challenges of making decisions to prevent sudden cardiac death in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Case summary: A 69-year-old male with a history of Type 1A Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease was admitted due to repetitive runs of ventricular tachycardia. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram, echocardiography, selective coronary angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance did not clarify the cause of the electrical storm. As conservative therapy was not successful, radiofrequency ablation was chosen to treat the electrical storm. After this procedure, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was implanted. The follow-up revealed severe perforation by the ventricular lead. An extraction was performed with no complications and a new lead was immediately implanted. The patient remains asymptomatic. Three episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia were recorded during the last follow-up. Discussion: This case illustrates the challenges of making decisions to prevent sudden cardiac death in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease after successful ablation for electrical storm. Due to a lack of evidence, atypical origin of arrhythmia, and clinical presentation, we did not consider this as idiopathic arrhythmia and decided to implant an ICD, which was complicated by severe perforation by the lead. Specific recommendations for preventing sudden cardiac death in rare cardiac conditions, such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, still need to be refined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.