Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39749123›Full record

ArticleDermatology reports2024

Comparison between dutasteride and finasteride in hair regrowth and reversal of miniaturization in male and female androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review.

Almuntsrbellah Almudimeegh, Hanadi AlMutairi, Fatimah AlTassan, Yomna AlQuraishi, Khalid Nabil Nagshabandi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07421804 (Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation of Topical Dutasteride as a Potential New Therapy of Facial Acne Vulgaris Versus the Triple Combination Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07421804 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation of Topical Dutasteride as a Potential New Therapy of Facial Acne Vulgaris Versus the Triple Combination Therapy (Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%, Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1%, and Adapalene 0.15% Gel)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsAcne VulgarisArmstopical dutasteride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Recent Advances in Drug Development for Hair Loss.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Almuntsrbellah AlmudimeeghDepartment of Dermatology, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh.
Hanadi AlMutairiDepartment of Dermatology, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh.
Fatimah AlTassanDepartment of Dermatology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh.
Yomna AlQuraishiCollege of Medicine, AlQassim University, Burydah, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Nabil NagshabandiDepartment of Dermatology, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays androgenetic alopecia (AGA) has become a common concern of affected subjects of both sexes. Finasteride is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of male AGA. There is no clear evidence to support the use of dutasteride in male AGA. In female AGA, the effectiveness of dutasteride and finasteride is still under debate, and there is no clear evidence to use any of them in female AGA. A systematic review was conducted to compare dutasteride and finasteride in treating both male and female AGA and their efficacy, safety, and side effects with effective dosage. The review was done using several databases including: PubMed, Ovid Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane, using the following search terms/key words: "Dutasteride", "Finasteride", "Male pattern hair loss", "Female pattern hair loss", "Efficacy", "Tolerability", "Side effects", and "Comparison". Articles related to the efficacy, tolerability, and side effects of dutasteride and finasteride in the treatment of male and female AGA were specifically sought, considering the doses used for each medication. The review encompassed a total of nine studies. Four randomized controlled trials, one single-arm trial, two prospective cohorts, and two retrospective cohort studies. Seven studies exclusively enrolled male participants, while only two included female participants. All groups receiving various doses of dutasteride and finasteride exhibited a significant increase in hair count compared to the placebo group. Notably, dutasteride (0.5 mg) and dutasteride (2.5 mg) were significantly more effective than finasteride (1 mg) in increasing hair counts. Furthermore, no significant difference in adverse events was observed between finasteride and dutasteride. Dutasteride is more potent than finasteride in treating AGA in both males and females. All the adverse events between finasteride and dutasteride were comparable.

Indexed as

androgenetic alopeciadutasteridefinasteridehair lossside effects

Identifiers

PMID39749123
PMCPMC11694415

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.