ReviewJournal of microscopy2026
Imaging malaria parasites across scales and time.
Review in Journal of microscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging malaria parasites across scales and time.Journal of microscopy · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-powered microscopy: Transforming the landscape of parasitology.Journal of microscopy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The idea that disease is caused at the cellular level is so fundamental to us that we might forget the critical role microscopy played in generating and developing this insight. Visually identifying diseased or infected cells lays the foundation for any effort to curb human pathology. Since the discovery of the Plasmodium-infected red blood cells, which cause malaria, microscopy has undergone an impressive development now literally resolving individual molecules. This review explores the expansive field of light microscopy, focusing on its application to malaria research. Imaging technologies have transformed our understanding of biological systems, yet navigating the complex and ever-growing landscape of techniques can be daunting. This review offers a guide for researchers, especially those working on malaria, by providing historical context as well as practical advice on selecting the right imaging approach. The review advocates an integrated methodology that prioritises the research question while considering key factors like sample preparation, fluorophore choice, imaging modality, and data analysis. In addition to presenting seminal studies and innovative applications of microscopy, the review highlights a broad range of topics, from traditional techniques like white light microscopy to advanced methods such as superresolution microscopy and time-lapse imaging. It addresses the emerging challenges of microscopy, including phototoxicity and trade-offs in resolution and speed, and offers insights into future technologies that might impact malaria research. This review offers a mix of historical perspective, technological progress, and practical guidance that appeal to novice and advanced microscopists alike. It aims to inspire malaria researchers to explore imaging techniques that could enrich their studies, thus advancing the field through enhanced visual exploration of the parasite across scales and time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.