ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025
Predicting intermediate-risk prostate cancer using machine learning.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposesIntermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR PCa) is the most common risk group for localized prostate cancer. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model that utilizes biopsy predictors to estimate the probability of IR PCa and assess its performance compared to the traditional clinical model.
methodsBetween January 2017 and December 2022, patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values of ≤ 20 ng/mL underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies. Patient's age, PSA, digital rectal exam, prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), and previous negative biopsy, number of positive cores, Gleason score, and biopsy outcome were recorded. Patients are categorized into no cancer, very low, low-, and intermediate-risk categories. The relationship between the model and IR PCa was investigated using binary generalized linear model (GLM) and assessed its discriminatory ability by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsAmong 729 patients, PCa was detected in 234 individuals (32.1%), with 120 (16.5%) diagnosed with IR PCa. The AUC for the novel model compared to the clinical model was 0.806 (95% CI: 0.722-0.889) versus 0.669 (95% CI: 0.543-0.790), with a p-value of 0.018. In DCA, the GLM outperformed the clinical model by over 7%, potentially allowing for an additional 44.3% reduction in unnecessary biopsies. The PSAD emerged as the most significant predictor.
conclusionWe developed a GLM utilizing pre-biopsy features to predict IR PCa. The model demonstrated good discrimination and clinical applicability, which could assist urologists in determining the necessity of a prostate biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39752015What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.