ArticleSpine deformity2025
Analysis of the hemivertebra resection strategy in adolescent and young adult congenital scoliosis caused by double hemivertebrae.
Article in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- One-stage posterior-only radical hemivertebra resection and short-segment fusion for congenital cervicothoracic scoliosis: a cohort study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Congenital Scoliosis: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnosis, Management, and Surgical Decision-Making in Pediatric Spinal Deformity-An Expanded Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study is to conduct a retrospective review of the selective resection strategies, their immediate efficacy and prognosis, using double hemivertebrae (DHV) as illustrative cases.
methodsA total of 59 adolescent and young adult patients with DHV were enrolled from 2009 to 2021. They were categorized into sagittal kyphosis group (SKG), coronal takeoff group (CTG) and balanced group (BG). The selective resection strategies for each group were reviewed.
resultsNineteen patients presented ipsilateral DHV, including 15 cases of continuous type (interval ≤ 3 vertebrae) and 4 cases of skipping type (interval ≥ 4 vertebrae), while 40 patients presented bilateral DHV, including 25 cases of continuous type and 15 cases of skipping type. The proportions of patients with 0, 1 and 2 HV resections were 26%, 58% and 16% in the ipsilateral group, and 45%, 48% and 7% in the bilateral group, respectively. The rate of HV resection in the SKG, CTG and BG was 77%, 61%, 33%, respectively. Kyphosis was the primary indicator for HV resection (60%), followed by coronal takeoff effect (21%) and coronal segmental scoliosis (19%). Significant curve progression due to misresection or mis-preservation of HV was recorded as 1.7% and 3.4%, respectively.
conclusionsKyphosis, coronal cervicothoracic or lumbosacral takeoff caused by hemivertebrae are primary indicators for selective hemivertebrectomy. For balanced DHV, the necessity of hemivertebrectomy is relatively low. Misresection or mis-preservation of HV may cause iatrogenic coronal imbalance and secondary severe curve progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39752124What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.