Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39752322›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025

Tocilizumab and rituximab for systemic sclerosis interstitial lung disease: a real-world cohort analysis.

Nina R Goldman, Svetlana I Nihtyanova, Claire F Beesley, Athol U Wells, Christopher P Denton, Elisabetta A Renzoni, Rizgar Mageed, Voon H Ong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Managing paraneoplastic GABABMC neurology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nina R GoldmanDivision of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6800-4230
Svetlana I NihtyanovaDivision of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5178-9038
Claire F BeesleyDivision of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3254-729X
Athol U WellsInterstitial Lung Disease Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2108-6248
Christopher P DentonDivision of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3975-8938
Elisabetta A RenzoniInterstitial Lung Disease Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1118-797X
Rizgar MageedCentre for Translation Medicine and Therapeutics, Queen Mary University, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1561-784X
Voon H OngDivision of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5474-0053

Funding

Medical Research Council and Scleroderma & Raynaud's UK MR/V030108/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSSc-interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the leading causes of mortality in SSc. Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) support rituximab and tocilizumab monotherapy but there are limited data regarding their use for those who fail standard immunomodulatory therapies.

methodsSSc patients treated with rituximab or tocilizumab were retrospectively identified in a single centre cohort. Linear mixed effect models were used to analyse before and after treatment lung function trajectory, and identify patient characteristics associated with treatment response.

resultsA total of 127 patients were included for analysis. Fifty-one of 94 (54.2%) and 13 of 33 (39.4%) of the rituximab and tocilizumab cohorts, respectively, were receiving concurrent MMF. Pre-treatment decline in absolute change % forced vital capacity (%FVC)/year and % diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (%DLCO)/year, respectively, was similar in both cohorts (-3.2% and -4.0% rituximab, and -3.2% and -3.6% tocilizumab). Both treatments resulted in lung function stabilization (%FVC/year and %DLCO/year: 1.2% and +0.2% rituximab cohort, 1.0% and 1.0% tocilizumab cohort). Anti-topoisomerase antibody (ATA)-positive patients had a significant response on %FVC/year to tocilizumab compared with ATA-negative patients. Gender had a significant impact on %FVC/year response to rituximab, with males responding to a greater degree than females. Age, ILD extent and skin subset had no impact on treatment response.

conclusionCombination rituximab or tocilizumab with background immunosuppressive therapy is associated with stabilization in lung function trajectory among those who remain refractory to standard immunosuppressives. Specific patient characteristics have an impact on lung function response. Improved FVC response among ATA patients receiving tocilizumab validate data from RCTs.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmunologic FactorsLung Diseases, InterstitialRituximabScleroderma, SystemicAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVital CapacityAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmunologic FactorsRituximabtocilizumabanti-topoisomerase antibodyinterstitial lung diseaserituximabsystemic sclerosistocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID39752322
PMCPMC12695047

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.