Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753643›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Addressing inter individual variability in CSF levels of brain derived proteins across neurodegenerative diseases.

Sára Mravinacová, Sofia Bergström, Jennie Olofsson, Nerea Gómez de San José, Sarah Anderl-Straub, Janine Diehl-Schmid, Klaus Fassbender, Klaus Fliessbach, Holger Jahn, Johannes Kornhuber and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ratios of CSF proteins reflect cognitive function in ALS.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Sára MravinacováDepartment of Protein Science, SciLifeLab, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sofia BergströmDepartment of Protein Science, SciLifeLab, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jennie OlofssonDepartment of Protein Science, SciLifeLab, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nerea Gómez de San JoséDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ulm (UKU), Ulm, Germany.
Sarah Anderl-StraubDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ulm (UKU), Ulm, Germany.
Janine Diehl-SchmidDepartment of Psychiatry, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Klaus FassbenderDepartment of Neurology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Klaus FliessbachDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Bonn and DZNE Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Holger JahnDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital, Hamburg, Germany.
Johannes KornhuberDepartment of Psychiatry, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
G Bernhard LandwehrmeyerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ulm (UKU), Ulm, Germany.
Martin LauerCenter for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Johannes LevinDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Albert C LudolphDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ulm (UKU), Ulm, Germany.
Johannes PrudloRostock University Medical Center and German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany.
Anja SchneiderDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Bonn and DZNE Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Matthias L SchroeterClinic for Cognitive Neurology, University Clinic Leipzig, and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Jens WiltfangDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, and DZNE, Goettingen, Germany.
Petra SteinackerDepartment of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
FTLD Consortium
Markus OttoDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ulm (UKU), Ulm, Germany.
Peter NilssonDepartment of Protein Science, SciLifeLab, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna MånbergDepartment of Protein Science, SciLifeLab, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. anna.manberg@scilifelab.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis and monitoring of neurodegenerative diseases require reliable biomarkers. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteins are promising candidates for reflecting brain pathology; however, their diagnostic utility may be compromised by natural variability between individuals, weakening their association with disease. Here, we measured the levels of 69 pre-selected proteins in cerebrospinal fluid using antibody-based suspension bead array technology in a multi-disease cohort of 499 individuals with neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's disease (AD), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, primary progressive aphasias, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), corticobasal syndrome, primary supranuclear palsy, along with healthy controls. We identify significant inter-individual variability in overall CSF levels of brain-derived proteins, which could not be attributed to specific disease associations. Using linear modelling, we show that adjusting for median CSF levels of brain-derived proteins increases the diagnostic accuracy of proteins previously identified as altered in CSF in the context of neurodegenerative disorders. We further demonstrate a simplified approach for the adjustment using pairs of correlated proteins with opposite alteration in the diseases. With this approach, the proteins adjust for each other and further increase the biomarker performance through additive effect. When comparing the diseases, two proteins-neurofilament medium and myelin basic protein-showed increased levels in ALS compared to other diseases, and neurogranin showed a specific increase in AD. Several other proteins showed similar trends across the studied diseases, indicating that these proteins likely reflect shared processes related to neurodegeneration. Overall, our findings suggest that accounting for inter-individual variability is crucial in future studies to improve the identification and performance of relevant biomarkers. Importantly, we highlight the need for multi-disease studies to identify disease-specific biomarkers.

Indexed as

BiomarkersNeurodegenerative DiseasesAgedAlzheimer DiseaseAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisBrainCerebrospinal Fluid ProteinsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersCerebrospinal Fluid ProteinsAffinity proteomicsBiomarkerCerebrospinal fluidInter-individual variabilityMulti-diseaseNeurodegeneration

Identifiers

PMID39753643
PMCPMC11698900

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.