SynthesisMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Deep learning in 3D cardiac reconstruction: a systematic review of methodologies and dataset.
Synthesis in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of artificial intelligence in pediatric cardiovascular imaging: clinical applications and future directions in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- 3D Spatiotemporal cardiac reconstruction for predicting MACE in acute myocardial infarction.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- A Paradigm Shift in Congenital Heart Disease: A Scientometric Portrait of the Rise of Computational Intelligence.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an advanced methodology for 3D heart reconstruction using a combination of deep learning models and computational techniques, addressing critical challenges in cardiac modeling and segmentation. A multi-dataset approach was employed, including data from the UK Biobank, MICCAI Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation (MM-WHS) challenge, and clinical datasets of congenital heart disease. Preprocessing steps involved segmentation, intensity normalization, and mesh generation, while the reconstruction was performed using a blend of statistical shape modeling (SSM), graph convolutional networks (GCNs), and progressive GANs. The statistical shape models were utilized to capture anatomical variations through principal component analysis (PCA), while GCNs refined the meshes derived from segmented slices. Synthetic data generated by progressive GANs enabled augmentation, particularly useful for congenital heart conditions. Evaluation of the reconstruction accuracy was performed using metrics such as Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Chamfer distance, and Hausdorff distance, with the proposed framework demonstrating superior anatomical precision and functional relevance compared to traditional methods. This approach highlights the potential for automated, high-resolution 3D heart reconstruction applicable in both clinical and research settings. The results emphasize the critical role of deep learning in enhancing anatomical accuracy, particularly for rare and complex cardiac conditions. This paper is particularly important for researchers wanting to utilize deep learning in cardiac imaging and 3D heart reconstruction, bringing insights into the integration of modern computational methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39753994What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.