ArticleBMC genomics2025
The curated Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM genome provides insights into strain specificity and microevolution.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the emerging role of CRISPR-Cas systems in probiotic development.Engineering microbiology · 2026Review
- One Health Genomic Perspective on Pseudescherichia vulneris: A Neglected Reservoir of Last-Resort Resistance Genes.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- Spatial Heterogeneity ofJournal of parasitology research · 2026Review
- Probiotics Attenuate Food Allergy via Short-Chain Fatty Acids-Mediated Immune Modulation and Gut Barrier Restoration.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe advent of next generation sequencing technologies has enabled a surge in the number of whole genome sequences in public databases, and our understanding of the composition and evolution of bacterial genomes. Besides model organisms and pathogens, some attention has been dedicated to industrial bacteria, notably members of the Lactobacillaceae family that are commonly studied and formulated as probiotic bacteria. Of particular interest is Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM, an extensively studied strain that has been widely commercialized for decades and is being used for the delivery of vaccines and therapeutics.
resultsHere, we revisit the L. acidophilus genome, which was sequenced twenty years ago, and determined the core and pan genomes of 114 publicly available L. acidophilus strains, spanning commercial isolates, academic strains and clones from the scientific literature. Results indicate a predictable high level of homogeneity within the species, but also reveal surprising mis-assemblies. Furthermore, by investigating twenty one available L. acidophilus NCFM-derived variants, we document overall genomic stability, with no observed genomic re-arrangement or inversions.
conclusionThis study provides a comparative analysis of the currently available genomes for L. acidophilus and examines microevolution patterns for several strains derived from L. acidophilus NCFM, which revealed no to very few SNPs with strains sequenced at different points in time using different sequencing technologies and platforms. This re-affirms its suitability for industrial deployment as a probiotic and its use as an engineering chassis and delivery modality for novel biotherapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.