Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39754046›Full record

ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2025

Migraine in men.

Mira P Fitzek, Deirdre M Boucherie, Tessa de Vries, Cleo Handtmann, Haniyeh Fathi, Bianca Raffaelli, Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. What does a migraine aura look like?-A systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex and gender-related differences in neurological diseases: current challenges and recommendations for clinical practice.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mira P Fitzek *Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Deirdre M Boucherie *Division of Pharmacology and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA, 3000, The Netherlands.
Tessa de VriesDivision of Pharmacology and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA, 3000, The Netherlands.
Cleo HandtmannDepartment of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Haniyeh FathiStudent Research Committee, Alborz University of Medical Science, Karaj, Iran.
Bianca Raffaelli *Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink *Division of Pharmacology and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA, 3000, The Netherlands. a.vanharen-maassenvandenbrink@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

Dutch Research Council (ZonMw/NWO, Vici Grant) 09150181910040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigraine is a common primary headache disorder, less frequently affecting men than women, and often regarded as predominantly a "women's disease." Despite this, migraine in men presents with unique characteristics in terms of symptoms, treatment responses, comorbidities, and pain perception. Historically, research has focused more on migraine in women, overlooking critical male-specific aspects.

resultsThis review delves into the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and particular challenges of diagnosing and managing migraine in men. It addresses sex-specific triggers, hormonal influences, and comorbid conditions affecting migraine prevalence and severity in men. Additionally, the review evaluates current therapeutic strategies, underscoring the necessity for individualized approaches. Men with migraine often exhibit atypical symptoms compared to the ICHD-3 criteria and are less likely to report common associated symptoms. They also tend to have fewer psychological comorbidities, respond more favorably to pharmacological treatments, yet are less likely to seek medical support. The reasons for these sex disparities are complex, involving biological, psychosocial, and cultural factors, such as brain structural differences, differences in functional responses to painful stimuli, hormonal effects, and behavioral influences like adherence to masculine norms and stigma.

conclusionMen are underrepresented in clinical migraine research. In contrast, preclinical studies often focus solely in male animals as a result of various misconceptions. This disparity necessitates greater focus on sex-specific aspects of migraine to enhance diagnosis, treatment, and research. Addressing stigma, increasing healthcare access, and ensuring balanced sex and gender representation in future studies is crucial for a comprehensive understanding and effective management of migraine for all patients.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersHumansMaleSex CharacteristicsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID39754046
PMCPMC11697684

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.