ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2025
Migraine in men.
Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of fertility treatments on headache disorders: a systematic review with an overview of treatment modalities.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Pooled it
- What does a migraine aura look like?-A systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Pooled it
- Oxytocin receptor antagonism in migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled provocation study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Trial
- Sildenafil provokes headache but not migraine in men with migraine without aura: a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Trial
- [Migraine in men: biological, psychosocial and clinical characteristics].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Article
- Clinical and social burden of migraine in Japanese males: a cross-sectional comparison with females without menstrual migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Interictal burden, not ictal burden, drives work productivity impairment in headache disorders: insights from a Japanese cross-sectional study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Sex and gender-related differences in neurological diseases: current challenges and recommendations for clinical practice.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Factors contributing to inaccurate migraine diagnosis: a prospective study at a tertiary hospital in Southern Thailand.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- The association between social factors and migraine or severe headache in men: a secondary analysis of national population-based studies with machine learning models.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Sex-related disparities in migraine recognition and management: insights from a tertiary headache center cohort.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Migraine in men - differences in phenotype and treatment patterns: results from the Migraine in Poland cross-sectional national survey.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Sex hormone profiles in men with migraine: a cross-sectional, matched cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Sex differences in the clinical features of 2,841 patients with migraine: aFrontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMigraine is a common primary headache disorder, less frequently affecting men than women, and often regarded as predominantly a "women's disease." Despite this, migraine in men presents with unique characteristics in terms of symptoms, treatment responses, comorbidities, and pain perception. Historically, research has focused more on migraine in women, overlooking critical male-specific aspects.
resultsThis review delves into the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and particular challenges of diagnosing and managing migraine in men. It addresses sex-specific triggers, hormonal influences, and comorbid conditions affecting migraine prevalence and severity in men. Additionally, the review evaluates current therapeutic strategies, underscoring the necessity for individualized approaches. Men with migraine often exhibit atypical symptoms compared to the ICHD-3 criteria and are less likely to report common associated symptoms. They also tend to have fewer psychological comorbidities, respond more favorably to pharmacological treatments, yet are less likely to seek medical support. The reasons for these sex disparities are complex, involving biological, psychosocial, and cultural factors, such as brain structural differences, differences in functional responses to painful stimuli, hormonal effects, and behavioral influences like adherence to masculine norms and stigma.
conclusionMen are underrepresented in clinical migraine research. In contrast, preclinical studies often focus solely in male animals as a result of various misconceptions. This disparity necessitates greater focus on sex-specific aspects of migraine to enhance diagnosis, treatment, and research. Addressing stigma, increasing healthcare access, and ensuring balanced sex and gender representation in future studies is crucial for a comprehensive understanding and effective management of migraine for all patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.