Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39754225›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Developing a knowledge transfer and exchange strategy for a clinical trials unit.

Annabelle South, Berta Terré Torras, Hannah Rush, Anna Goodman, Sharon Love

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annabelle SouthMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK. A.south@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8912-2001
Berta Terré TorrasMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK.
Hannah RushMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK.
Anna GoodmanMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK.
Sharon LoveMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/01Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

need for a strategic approach to knowledge transfer and exchangeLate-phase clinical trials and systematic reviews find results that have the potential to improve health outcomes for people. However, there are often delays in these results influencing clinical practice. We developed a knowledge transfer and exchange strategy to support research teams, aiming to identify activities along the research process to maximise and accelerate the research impact. OUR KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER AND EXCHANGE STRATEGY: The strategy has five strands of activity across the life-course of our research: 1. Partnerships with external stakeholders (including patient and public involvement, charities, policymakers, healthcare professionals, professional bodies, regulators and industry) 2. Communication (including the development of research impact strategies and use of communication tools and channels) 3. Maximising the scientific value of our studies (including open access, data and sample sharing, and incorporating multi-disciplinary components within studies) 4. Strengthening capacity (including building internal and partner capacity to communicate effectively, and strengthening the capacity of external stakeholders to understand and apply our research). 5. Learning and sharing (evaluating the impact of research, sharing lessons learnt internally and externally) The strategy has helped trial teams think systematically about impact and was easy to use.

conclusionsOur strategy helps researchers systematically identify activities which may improve the usefulness and uptake of their study results. While developed in a single trials unit, we think it may be of use to others.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCooperative BehaviorInformation DisseminationStakeholder ParticipationCommunicationDiffusion of InnovationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationResearch DesignResearch PersonnelTranslational Research, BiomedicalClinical trialsCommunicationImpactKnowledge transfer and exchangeStrategy

Identifiers

PMID39754225
PMCPMC11697623

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.