Evidence mapPaperPMID 39754258Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Predicting Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the first trimester using machine learning algorithms: a cross-sectional study at a hospital fertility health center in Iran.

Somayeh Kianian Bigdeli, Marjan Ghazisaedi, Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh, Sedigheh Hantoushzadeh, Marjan Ahmadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antepartum prediction of shoulder dystocia using machine learning.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  7. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Artificial Intelligence in Gestational Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Somayeh Kianian BigdeliDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Marjan GhazisaediDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ghazimar@tums.ac.ir.
Seyed Mohammad AyyoubzadehDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. smayyoubzadeh@tums.ac.ir.
Sedigheh HantoushzadehVali-E-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Family Health Research Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Marjan AhmadiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is a common complication during pregnancy. Late diagnosis can have significant implications for both the mother and the fetus. This research aims to create an early prediction model for GDM in the first trimester of pregnancy. This model will help obstetricians and gynecologists make appropriate decisions for treating and preventing GDM complications.

methodsThis applied descriptive study was conducted at the fertility health center of Vali-e-Asr Hospital in Tehran, Iran. The dataset was collected from the records of pregnant women registered in the hospital's system from 2020 to 2022. Risk factors for designing predictive models were identified through literature review, expert opinions, and clinical specialists' input. The extracted information underwent preprocessing, and six machine learning (ML) methods were developed and evaluated for GDM prediction in the first trimester of pregnancy: decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost).

resultsModels were evaluated using accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Based on the glucose tolerance test (GTT) results, the RF model achieved the best performance in GDM prediction, with 89% accuracy, 86% precision, 92% recall, and 94% AUC, using demographic variables, medical history, and clinical findings. In modeling based on insulin consumption, the RF model achieved the best results with 62% accuracy, 60% precision, 63% recall, and 63% AUC in predicting GDM using demographic variables and medical history.

conclusionThe results of this study demonstrate that ML algorithms, especially RF, have acceptable accuracy in the early prediction of GDM during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalMachine LearningPregnancy Trimester, FirstAdultAlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIranPregnancyArtificial intelligenceFirst trimester of pregnancyGestational diabetes mellitusMachine learningPredictionRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID39754258
PMCPMC11699820

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.