Evidence mapPaperPMID 39754350Full record

ArticleThe International journal of health planning and management2025

Patient's Perception of Primary Health Care Provision With Respect to Access, Continuity and Coordination-InCept: An International Qualitative Perspective.

Heidrun Sturm, Weber Julia, Fabiano Tonaco Borges, Andrew Dickinson, Beat Sottas, Carina Wennerholm, Christina Andreae, Maria Liljeroos, Tiny Jaarsma, Stefanie Joos and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of health planning and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Heidrun SturmInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4327-7205
Weber JuliaInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Fabiano Tonaco BorgesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, Brazil.
Andrew Dickinson7 David Place Surgery, Jersey, UK.
Beat SottasSottas Formative Works, Bourguillon, Switzerland.
Carina WennerholmDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Christina AndreaeDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Maria LiljeroosDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Tiny JaarsmaDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Stefanie JoosInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Antonia BauerInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft-AOBJ 657277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health care systems are confronted with an increasing burden of (multi-)morbidity and a shortfall of healthcare providers. Coordination and continuity of care in chronic and multi-morbid patient is especially important. As qualitative patient experience data within care processes is scarce, we aim to increase the understanding of chronically ill patient's perspectives by assessing patient experiences in different health systems while treated in primary care. Patients were recruited via GPs from Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, and the British island of Jersey. To ascertain regular healthcare utilisation, inclusion criteria were either a stroke, and/or a myocardial infarction or heart failure during the past year, and an underlying metabolic syndrome. Identical semi-structured interview-guides were used in the respective language. Transcribed interviews were analysed according to inductive-deductive qualitative content analysis. Based on 22 interviews we derived four main categories (patient centeredness, continuity, coordination, access). Overall, healthcare processes were considered positive if information flow was personal and functional. Non-physician staff seemed to create reassurance. A long-lasting doctor-patient relationship was connected to the context of trust and security. Patients were critical of a perceived lack of time, inducing insufficient counselling and information-flow. This international explorative study suggests that patients' experiences can provide important information about care provision. Patients consistently focused more on relational aspects rather than on structures or functions. This has connotations for healthcare planning; for example, by providing non-physician staff to support patients through their care pathway and to improve the cooperation between providers.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareHealth Services AccessibilityPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansInternationalityInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative Researchcontinuity of patient carehealth policypatient preferencesprimary health carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID39754350
PMCPMC12045762

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.