ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Mapping the knowledge landscape of the PET/MR domain: a multidimensional bibliometric analysis.
Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing mitochondrial quality control in oxidative stress and environmental resilience in aquaculture.Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
- Evaluation of INR101, a PSMA-TargetedEJNMMI research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis to explore research trends, collaboration patterns, and emerging themes in the PET/MR field based on published literature from 2010 to 2024.
methodsA detailed literature search was performed using the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database with keywords related to PET/MR. A total of 4,349 publications were retrieved and analyzed using various bibliometric tools, including VOSviewer and CiteSpace.
resultsThe analysis revealed an initial increase in PET/MR publications, peaking at 495 in 2021, followed by a slight decline. The USA, Germany, and China were the most prolific countries, with the USA demonstrating strong collaborative networks. Key institutions included the Stanford University, Technical University of Munich and University of Duisburg-Essen. Prominent authors were primarily from Germany, with significant contributions from University Hospital Essen. Major journals in the field included the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, and Physics in Medicine and Biology. Emerging research areas focused on oncology, neurological disorders, and cardiovascular diseases, with keywords such as "prostate cancer," "Alzheimer's disease," and "breast cancer" showing high research activity. Recent trends also highlight the growing integration of AI, particularly deep learning, to improve imaging reconstruction and diagnostic accuracy.
conclusionThe findings emphasize the need for continuous investment, strategic planning, and technological innovations to expand PET/MR's clinical applications. Future research should focus on optimizing imaging techniques, fostering international collaborations, and integrating emerging technologies like artificial intelligence to enhance PET/MR's diagnostic and therapeutic potential in precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39754665What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.