ArticleTranslational oncology2025
Enhancing chemotherapy response prediction via matched colorectal tumor-organoid gene expression analysis and network-based biomarker selection.
Article in Translational oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarker-guided responses in patient-derived organoids predict effective therapies in breast cancer.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Trial
- Machine learning-driven multi-targeted drug discovery in colon cancer using biomarker signatures.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Recent advances and challenges in colorectal cancer: From molecular research to treatment.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Integrating Tumor and Organoid DNA Methylation Profiles Reveals Robust Predictors of Chemotherapy Response in Rectal Cancer.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Commentary: Low expression of SOD and PRX4 as indicators of poor prognosis and systemic inflammation in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) presents significant challenges in chemotherapy response prediction due to its molecular heterogeneity. Current methods often fail to account for the complexity and variability inherent in individual tumors.
methodsWe developed a novel approach using matched CRC tumor and organoid gene expression data. We applied Consensus Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) across three datasets: CRC tumors, matched organoids, and an independent organoid dataset with IC50 drug response values, to identify key gene modules and hub genes linked to chemotherapy response, particularly 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).
findingsOur integrative analysis identified significant gene modules and hub genes associated with CRC chemotherapy response. The predictive model built from these findings demonstrated superior accuracy over traditional methods when tested on independent datasets. The matched tumor-organoid data approach proved effective in capturing relevant biomarkers, enhancing prediction reliability.
interpretationThis study provides a robust framework for improving CRC chemotherapy response predictions by leveraging matched tumor and organoid gene expression data. Our approach addresses the limitations of previous methods, offering a promising strategy for personalized treatment planning in CRC. Future research should aim to validate these findings and explore the integration of more comprehensive drug response data.
fundingThis research was supported by US National Cancer Institute grant R37CA248289, and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center. which receives funding from the National Cancer Institute award P30CA240139. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) under the following grants: T32CA009501-31A1 and R37CA248289. This work was also supported by the MSK P30CA008748 grant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.