ArticleScientific reports2025
Serial biomarker measurements may be helpful to predict the successful application of high flow nasal cannula in COVID-19 pneumonia patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of high-flow nasal cannula failure in critically ill patients: a narrative review.Journal of intensive care · 2026Review
- Early clinical and laboratory markers associated with post-COVID respiratory syndrome: A retrospective analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) can reduce the need for intubation in patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pneumonia induced acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), but predictors of HFNC success could be characterized better. C-reactive protein (CRP) and D-dimer are associated with COVID-19 severity and progression. However, no one has evaluated the use of serial CRP and D-dimer ratios to predict HFNC success. We retrospectively studied 194 HFNC-treated patients admitted between August 2020 and October 2022. CRP and D-dimer levels relative to baseline at HFNC initiation were calculated up to three days thereafter. Intubated and non-intubated patient comparisons were assessed by the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and t-test. Ninety-two patients were intubated and 102 were not. Median CRP ratios were lower in non-intubated versus intubated patients (0.69 v. 0.96, p = 0.050 for Day 1; 0.49 v. 0.61, p = 0.028 for Day 2; 0.33 v. 0.64, p = 0.008 for Day 3). D-dimer ratios did not change. CRP ratio monitoring in patients with AHRF due to COVID-19 within the first three days of HFNC application can serve as an objective adjunctive clinical tool to identify individuals who can continue to be supported with HFNC without escalating to invasive mechanical ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.