ReviewPediatric cardiology2026
Proposal: Bold New Indications for Transcatheter Pulmonary Flow Restrictors.
Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of Modified Microvascular Plugs as a Pulmonary Flow Restrictors in Congenital Heart Disease.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Small patients - Big needs: A material-based approach to develop miniaturised valves for congenital heart diseases.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor: Proposal: Bold New Indications for Transcatheter Pulmonary Flow Restrictors.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This proposal presents a proof of concept for the use of pulmonary flow restrictors (PFRs) based on MVP™-devices, drawing from clinical experience, and explores their potential role in the management of newborns with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), other complex left heart lesions, and infants with end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). At this early stage of age, manually adjusted PFRs can be tailored to patient's size and hemodynamic needs. Although currently used off-label, PFRs have substantial potential to improve outcomes in these vulnerable patient populations. When integrated into a holistic treatment strategy, they represent a promising advancement in care. There is significant potential to reduce mortality and improve the quality of life for neonates with HLHS and variants, as well as to support age-dependent functional regeneration in DCM, all while avoiding the need for advanced surgical procedures, including general anesthesia. The main barrier to broader adoption is the limited availability of appropriately sized MVP devices. However, with ongoing patient-centered knowledge sharing and refinement of transcatheter techniques, there is reason for optimism that PFRs, tailored for individual patients, could provide significant benefits to thousands of infants with congenital heart disease and DCM worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.