Evidence mapPaperPMID 39757391Full record

ReviewExpert review of endocrinology & metabolism2025

Acromegaly: diagnostic challenges and individualized treatment.

Pamela U Freda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current controversies in acromegaly care.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pamela U FredaDepartment of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1818-0762

Funding

Central Mediation of Growth Hormone Effects in HumansR01DK133392 · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · 2025 to 2025
$610k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK110771NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK133392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcromegaly is due in almost all cases to a GH-secreting pituitary tumor. GH and IGF-1 excesses lead to its multi-system clinical manifestations and comorbidities. Acromegaly is under-diagnosed and typically presents with advanced disease. When early or mild, clinical recognition and biochemical confirmation are especially challenging. Individualized treatment may optimize patient outcome. AREAS COVERED: This review covers challenges to diagnosing acromegaly and reviews therapies for acromegaly with a focus on those aspects that can be individualized. EXPERT OPINION: The first step in diagnosing acromegaly is recognizing it clinically. To improve this, increase awareness and education of the general population and healthcare professionals about the acromegaly phenotype is needed. Once suspected clinically, IGF-1 measurement is the initial step in making the biochemical diagnosis. GH may be < 1.0 µg/L after oral glucose suppression in early/mild cases. GH and IGF-1 should be considered in concert. Providers should be aware of conditions that can alter GH and IGF-1 levels and each assay's performance. An individualized treatment approach is best employed. Surgery is preferred as initial treatment and medical therapy as initial adjuvant therapy. In individualizing therapy, the advantages and disadvantages of each option and predictors of response to them should be considered.

Indexed as

AcromegalyPrecision MedicineHuman Growth HormoneHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IHuman Growth HormoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor IAcromegaly growth hormonecabergolineIGF-1pegvisomantradiosurgerysomatostatin receptor ligandssurgery

Identifiers

PMID39757391
PMCPMC11832332

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.