Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758485›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2024

Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement Among International Medical Students: Assessing Study Habits as a Novel Factor.

Parker Sheldon, Javier Mendez-Montejano, Andrew J Michalak, Juliana J Navarro, Cersten Bradley, Milliejoan Mongalo, Maria G Zavala-Cerna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Parker SheldonMilken Institute of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, D.C. USA.
Javier Mendez-MontejanoUnidad Académica Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Zapopan, Mexico 45129.
Andrew J MichalakNuvance Health, Danbury, CT USA.
Juliana J NavarroKansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, MO USA.
Cersten BradleyUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX USA.
Milliejoan MongaloHCA MountainView Hospital, Las Vegas, NV USA.
Maria G Zavala-CernaUnidad Académica Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Zapopan, Mexico 45129.ORCID 0000-0001-6508-9657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pharmacological cognitive enhancement (PCE) among healthy individuals with off-label use of medications raises ethical and safety concerns in academia. Among the few studies that have examined this phenomenon in medical students, the desire to improve performance and cope with high levels of stress are the most common associated factors implicated. Our main objective was to update current literature by exploring a novel factor by investigating the association between PCE use and student learning approaches among a cohort of international medical students. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study with an anonymous, online survey, distributed to year 1 US international medical students at Results: A total of 103 student responses were included, with 18 students (17.3%) reporting PCE use and a majority (61.1%) of whom were female. PCE users were less likely to adopt deep or strategic study approaches and were mainly motivated to improve academic performance. Discussion: We encourage universities to have open discussions about medication risks and forms to improve an active learning without its use, which might be beneficial in curbing the perceived need for pharmacologic enhancement. Further explorations are required to confirm if certain study habits are truly associated with PCE use. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02113-w.

Indexed as

Academic performanceAmphetaminesCognitive enhancementd-AmphetamineEthical issues in pharmacologyMedical educationMedical studentsMethylphenidatePharmacological cognitive enhancementPrevalenceSafety of cognitive enhancersStudy habitsStudy techniques

Identifiers

PMID39758485
PMCPMC11699064

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.