ReviewACS omega2024
Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Nanoindentation Research.
Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Zero-Dimensional Carbon-Based Nanomaterials in Anti-Corrosive Coating Applications: A Combined Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Graphene Oxide Research: Current Developments and Future Directions.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoindentation has gained significant attention as a method for the quantitative characterization of mechanical properties of materials at micro- and nanoscales. This study investigates trends in nanoindentation technology by visualizing and analyzing relevant publications. To achieve this, CiteSpace was utilized to analyze 14 373 papers from the Web of Science core database published between 2013 and 2022. The analysis examined the status and trends in nanoindentation technology, focusing on the publication counts, contributing countries, institutions, authors, and keywords. The results indicate a growing number of publications related to nanoindentation technology globally, with China leading in publication output. Upadrasta Ramamurty is recognized as the most prolific author, while the work of W.C. Oliver and G.M. Pharr has received substantial citations. Six research hotspots and their associated content are identified as current frontiers in this field. Future investigations may concentrate on the applicability range, measurement accuracy, and theoretical modeling of this technique. This review aims to assist scholars interested in nanoindentation technology in quickly identifying research priorities from a new perspective and anticipating the future trajectory of this field.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.