ArticlePatient preference and adherence2024
Participation and Compliance in a Multimodal Prehabilitation Program for Colorectal Cancer (PACE): A Qualitative Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prehabilitation for cancer surgery: a systematic review of qualitative literature from experienced stakeholders.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Psychological, social, and behavioral barriers and facilitators to prehabilitation before cancer surgery: a qualitative systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Long-term lifestyle effects of prehabilitation in colorectal cancer.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- Applying the COM-B Model to Understand Adherence to Tele-Exercise Prehabilitation Among Older Patients with Lung Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- A Qualitative Study on the Supportive Care Needs Preferences of Older Colorectal Cancer Patients: Insights from Patient Experiences.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Interest in prehabilitation, the preoperative enhancement of patients' condition, is rising in the surgical field. Challenging factors appear to be patients' motivation to participate in and their compliance with prehabilitation programs. The aim of this qualitative study was to study the real-life experience of prehabilitation by assessing the lived experience and perceptions of participants in a multimodal prehabilitation program and to explore factors that influence participation and compliance during prehabilitation. Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer and who had participated in the 4-week multimodal prehabilitation program "BEFORE" feasibility study were recruited. Their lived experiences were collected through semi-structured, individual, in-depth interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a thematical approach. As no new information emerged after the interviews, data were considered saturated. Results: Six patients were interviewed. Seven main themes were discussed during the interviews, including information provision, motivation for participation, and content of the program. The results of this study emphasize the importance of adequate patient education, in-hospital exercise with the supervision of physiotherapists, and a patient-centered program. Logistical problems and the impact of cancer diagnosis were most frequently reported as barriers to participation. Conclusion: Participation could be improved by providing adequate information and solving logistical issues. Patient-centeredness of the program is an important feature in improving adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.