Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39760076›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

Effect of differences in residual feed intake on gastrointestinal microbiota of Dexin fine-wool meat sheep.

Ziting Wang, Weiwei Wu, Xuefeng Lv, Weiting Xing, Xu Wang, Yong Tuo, Yan Ma, Linjiao He, Zhijun Zhang, Wenxin Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Phenological Changes in the Fecal Microbiota ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ziting WangFeed Research Institute of Xinjiang Academy of Animal Husbandry Sciences, Urumqi, China.
Weiwei WuXinjiang Academy of Animal Husbandry Sciences, Urumqi, China.
Xuefeng LvXinjiang Academy of Animal Husbandry Sciences, Urumqi, China.
Weiting XingXinjiang Academy of Animal Husbandry Sciences, Urumqi, China.
Xu WangXinjiang Academy of Animal Husbandry Sciences, Urumqi, China.
Yong TuoFeed Research Institute of Xinjiang Academy of Animal Husbandry Sciences, Urumqi, China.
Yan MaFeed Research Institute of Xinjiang Academy of Animal Husbandry Sciences, Urumqi, China.
Linjiao HeFeed Research Institute of Xinjiang Academy of Animal Husbandry Sciences, Urumqi, China.
Zhijun ZhangFeed Research Institute of Xinjiang Academy of Animal Husbandry Sciences, Urumqi, China.
Wenxin ZhengXinjiang Academy of Animal Husbandry Sciences, Urumqi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we examined the effects of different residual feed intakes (RFIs) on nutrient digestibility and the microbiota of the digestive tract of Dexin fine-wool sheep. Fifty 70-day-old Dexin fine-wool meat lambs were selected as the experimental group and fed in a single pen for 100 days. Based on their mid-term metabolic weight, 100-day average daily weight gain and daily feed intake, the male Dexin lambs were divided into a low-RFI group (13), a mid-RFI group (18), and a high-RFI group (11). Six male Dexin lambs were selected from each group to collect feces, rumen digesta and solid digesta. Rectal feces were collected from three lambs in each group. The results showed that the digestibility of dry matter and crude protein by sheep in the L-RFI group was than that in the H-RFI group (

Indexed as

bacteriafine-wool sheepfungigastrointestinal tractresidual intake feed

Identifiers

PMID39760076
PMCPMC11697150

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.