ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2025
Construction and evaluation of a prognostic model of autophagy-related genes in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a globally prevalent disease. Our article evaluates risk models based on autophagy- and HCC-related genes and their prognostic value by bioinformatics analytical methods to provide a scientific basis for clinical treatment. Methods: Prognostic genes were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox analyses, and risk scores were calculated. The value of risk models was analysed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), immune microenvironment and drug sensitivity. Prognostic gene-related regulatory mechanisms based on network database. Results: We screened four prognosis-related genes (SQSTM1, GABARAPL1, CDKN2A, HSPB8) for model construction. The AUC for 1-, 2- and 3-year survival was higher than 0.6 in both the training and validation sets. The nomogram constructed based on risk scores, pathologic_T predicted the outcome better. There were differences in the tumour microenvironment between the high and low risk groups, as evidenced by differences in the distribution of immune cells and differences in the expression of immune checkpoints. Conclusion: Our results illustrate that models, nomograms and risk scores were valuable for tumour progression. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.