ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2025
Real-world assessment of the patient profile, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes associated with erythropoietic and X-linked protoporphyria.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- New pharmacotherapies for the erythropoietic protoporphyrias: an analysis of trial protocols from a patient perspective.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Burden of illness and unmet needs in patients with erythropoietic protoporphyria and X-linked protoporphyria: A large US nationwide claims analysis.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
- Real-world assessment of the patient profile, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes associated with erythropoietic and X-linked protoporphyria.The Journal of dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) and X-linked protoporphyria (XLP) are rare genetic disorders. There are limited data regarding how these disorders are managed in real-world settings. The aim of this study was to document the characteristics and treatment patterns among patients diagnosed with EPP or XLP in general real-world settings in the United States. We, therefore, conducted a retrospective medical record review of patients diagnosed with EPP or XLP on or before July 1, 2020. Data were analyzed for patients with EPP (n = 299) and XLP (n = 91). Outcomes included demographic and clinical characteristics, diagnostic testing, therapy recommendations, office visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. Costs were assigned to healthcare resources. Mean (standard deviation [SD]; median) time between the first symptom documented in the medical records and diagnosis was 2.9 (5.1; 1.3) years. The most common pre-diagnostic tests were liver function, total plasma and erythrocyte protoporphyrin, genetic tests, and renal function. Patients were advised to use sunscreen (85%) or modify their lifestyle (83%). Within 12 months of diagnosis, the mean (SD; median) number of office visits, emergency department visits, and inpatient hospitalizations related to EPP or XLP were 4.0 (3.5; 3.0), 0.8 (1.6; 0), and 0.4 (1.3; 0), respectively. Patients with EPP or XLP have several unmet needs, including timely and accurate diagnosis, symptom relief, and efficacious prevention of phototoxic reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.