SynthesisCurrent cardiology reports2025
Risk and Protective Factors of Poor Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and their Clinical Features with Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Which Patient Benefits from Guideline-directed Medical Therapy for Heart Failure and Rate Control versus Rhythm Control in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation and What are Those Therapies?Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026Review
- Streamlining heart failure patient care with machine learning of thoracic cavity sound data.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Serum Levels of Irisin Are Positively Associated with Improved Cardiac Function in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsHeart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) patients could still develop adverse outcomes despite EF improvement. This study evaluates the risk and protective factors of poor clinical outcomes in HFimpEF patients.
methodsSystematic searching was done to include studies that evaluate the risks of developing poor outcomes in HFimpEF patients. HFimpEF is defined as improvement of 5-10% EF within 6-12 months or normalization of EF > 40%. Poor clinical outcome is defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, HF rehospitalization, and requirement of LVAD/ transplant. Odds ratios of outcome are pooled with random effects model. A subgroup analysis of multivariate analysis-only studies was also conducted.
results32 studies comprising 10,740 HFimpEF patients are included. Poor clinical outcomes followed up for approximately 3 years, are seen in 18.9% of HFimpEF patients. Twelve statistically significant factors that increase the risk of outcome are found. Among them, anemia (OR 7.69, CI 3.48-16.99, I
conclusionHFimpEF patients are not fully recovered and patient stratification based on risk and protective factors is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39760806What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.