Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39760842›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

Introducing robot-assisted kidney transplantation in a high-volume centre in Denmark: a pilot and feasibility study.

Milla Ortved, Julia Dagnæs-Hansen, Hein V Stroomberg, Vladimir Karas, Malene Rohrsted, Søren S Sørensen, Andreas Røder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Milla OrtvedUrological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Ole Maaloes Vej 24, 2. Floor, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark. milla.ortved@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2021-2281
Julia Dagnæs-HansenUrological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Ole Maaloes Vej 24, 2. Floor, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2719-2885
Hein V StroombergUrological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Ole Maaloes Vej 24, 2. Floor, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7293-9506
Vladimir KarasDepartment of Urology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Malene RohrstedDepartment of Urology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Søren S SørensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5898-8048
Andreas RøderUrological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Ole Maaloes Vej 24, 2. Floor, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0019-5333

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF21OC0072224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) may reduce surgical complications compared to open kidney transplantation (OKT), but no randomised trials have explored this to date. The aim of the present study is to explore the feasibility of introducing RAKT at our institution, making it available in deceased donor transplantation and evaluate early surgical outcomes prior to performing a randomised trial comparing RAKT to OKT. RAKT was performed at Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. The patients were included from June 2022 until May 2023. The data were collected through the national electronic health records. The data include recipient, donor and intraoperative characteristics, postoperative complications within 90 days graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification and days alive and out of hospital (DAOH). The functional outcomes include eGFR, plasma creatinine, delayed graft function, and rejection episodes. Sixteen RAKTs were performed. Fourteen cases were transplantations with living donors and two cases were with deceased donors. There were no major intra-operative adverse events and no conversions. The median operative time was 223 min and median blood loss 150 ml. The median length of stay was 7 days and median DAOH was 82. Seven complications occurred in five patients at 90 days postoperatively; however, there were no major surgical complications. This study comprehensively assesses patient morbidity following RAKT in a small cohort with results indicating favourable outcomes. This supported our clinical assumption of reduced complications for a randomised trial comparing OKT and RAKT (the ORAKTx trial) which has been initiated (NCT identifier 05730257).

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesKidney TransplantationRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedDenmarkFemaleHospitals, High-VolumeHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePilot ProjectsPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeKidney failureRobotic surgerySurgical complicationsTransplantationUrology

Identifiers

PMID39760842
PMCPMC11703890

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.