ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Introducing robot-assisted kidney transplantation in a high-volume centre in Denmark: a pilot and feasibility study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond living donation: robot-assisted kidney transplantation using deceased-donor grafts-a scoping review of selection, ischaemia logistics, and allograft outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- From Carrel to Robotics: Renal Transplantation and the Evolution of its Surgical Technique.Current urology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) may reduce surgical complications compared to open kidney transplantation (OKT), but no randomised trials have explored this to date. The aim of the present study is to explore the feasibility of introducing RAKT at our institution, making it available in deceased donor transplantation and evaluate early surgical outcomes prior to performing a randomised trial comparing RAKT to OKT. RAKT was performed at Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. The patients were included from June 2022 until May 2023. The data were collected through the national electronic health records. The data include recipient, donor and intraoperative characteristics, postoperative complications within 90 days graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification and days alive and out of hospital (DAOH). The functional outcomes include eGFR, plasma creatinine, delayed graft function, and rejection episodes. Sixteen RAKTs were performed. Fourteen cases were transplantations with living donors and two cases were with deceased donors. There were no major intra-operative adverse events and no conversions. The median operative time was 223 min and median blood loss 150 ml. The median length of stay was 7 days and median DAOH was 82. Seven complications occurred in five patients at 90 days postoperatively; however, there were no major surgical complications. This study comprehensively assesses patient morbidity following RAKT in a small cohort with results indicating favourable outcomes. This supported our clinical assumption of reduced complications for a randomised trial comparing OKT and RAKT (the ORAKTx trial) which has been initiated (NCT identifier 05730257).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.