Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39760896›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2025

Effect of post-processing on the surface, optical, mechanical, and dimensional properties of 3D-printed orthodontic clear retainers.

Siew Peng Neoh, Anak Khantachawana, Peerapong Santiwong, Rochaya Chintavalakorn, Toemsak Srikhirin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of Polishing, Resin Coating, and Glaze Coating on the Surface Properties of a 3D-Printed Splint Resin.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Siew Peng NeohDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, 6 Yothi Alley, Phayathai, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Anak KhantachawanaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, 126 Pracha Uthit Road, Bang Mot, Thung Khru, Bangkok, 10140, Thailand.
Peerapong SantiwongDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, 6 Yothi Alley, Phayathai, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Rochaya ChintavalakornDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, 6 Yothi Alley, Phayathai, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. krittika.chi@mahidol.ac.th.
Toemsak SrikhirinSchool of Materials Science and Innovation, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Phuttamonthon 4 Road, Salaya, Phuttamonthon District, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo address the high surface roughness and poor optical properties of three-dimensional (3D) printed orthodontic clear retainers, an alternative post-processing protocol was investigated with the goal of achieving improved surface, optical, and mechanical properties while preserving dimensional accuracy. MATERIALS AND

methodsSamples were prepared from two biocompatible methacrylate-based 3D-printing resins (Formlabs Dental LT Clear V2, NextDent OrthoFlex) and one thermoplastic material (Duran). For the 3D-printed resins, one group was post-processed by rinsing in isopropyl alcohol, while another group was centrifuged before post-curing in glycerine. Three different testing conditions were used: dry, wet (24-h water immersion), and aged (thermocycling for 10,000 cycles). Surface characteristics were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. Optical properties were assessed for transparency and colour stability, while mechanical properties were elicited from tensile and microhardness tests. Water sorption and solubility were calculated. Samples mounted on a dental model were scanned by micro-computed tomography to measure thickness and gap width.

results3D-printed samples post-processed by centrifugation showed significantly decreased surface roughness and improved visible light transmission, colour stability, tensile strength, and hardness. The centrifuged samples showed significantly increased thickness, while designing an offset equal to this thickness improved the adaptation.

conclusionsPost-processing by centrifugation produces surface coating that enhances the surface and optical properties of the 3D-printed orthodontic retainers, while curing in an oxygen-free environment improves their mechanical properties. Design modifications may be necessary for this protocol to ensure proper adaptation to the dentition. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Proper design and post-processing protocols are necessary to achieve the desired properties of orthodontic clear retainers.

Indexed as

Materials TestingOrthodontic RetainersPrinting, Three-DimensionalSurface PropertiesHardnessOrthodontic Appliance DesignTensile StrengthX-Ray Microtomography3D printingCentrifugationClear retainersCoatingPost-processing

Identifiers

PMID39760896
PMCPMC11703938

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.