ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Predictors of physical activity among pregnant women in Harare, Zimbabwe.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring perceived awareness, barriers and enablers of pregnant women towards physical activity in Ethiopian cities: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Reimagining prenatal physical activity and exercise as potential therapeutic strategy in promoting maternal health.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluating the barriers to physical activity during pregnancy: a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Three distinct profiles of barriers to physical activity during pregnancy among Chinese women: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extensive benefits of physical activity (PA) are well known. However, PA participation among pregnant women remains low. This study evaluated PA levels and associated factors, including barriers and facilitators in pregnant women in Harare, Zimbabwe. This cross-sectional study recruited 517 pregnant women receiving antenatal care across ten primary healthcare clinics. Data were collected using the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ), Exercise Benefits and Barriers Scale (EBBS) and EQ-5D-5L. We used descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression for analyses. The mean age of the study participants was 26.1 (±5.9) years. 89% of the pregnant women did not meet the WHO recommendations of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity PA. For women who were active, most engaged in moderate intensity (41.9%) PA and household activity (51.1%). The most perceived barriers and facilitators to PA were reported as exercise environment and life enhancement, respectively. Lower education (AOR 5.24 [1.69: 16.19]), multigravida (AOR .47 [.31: .42]), not exercising pre-pregnancy (AOR 2.02 [1.30: 3.13]), perceived decreased current PA level (AOR 2.04 [1.22: 3.43]) and not being advised by a doctor on exercise (AOR 2.05 [1.04: 4.04]) were associated with physical inactivity. Physical inactivity is endemic among Zimbabwean pregnant women, there is a need for bespoke and contextualized interventions. Implementing supervised and group-based antenatal exercise classes must be considered.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.