Evidence mapPaperPMID 39761263Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Predictors of physical activity among pregnant women in Harare, Zimbabwe.

Anotida R Hove, Eleanor N Sithambuli, Wethembekile P Ncube, Shalom R Doyce, Sandra N Mukwekwe, Tariro Mapuranga, Kudakwashe Tirivanhu, Dixon Chibanda, Jermaine M Dambi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anotida R HoveDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4050-0135
Eleanor N SithambuliDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1731-0248
Wethembekile P NcubeDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Shalom R DoyceDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Sandra N MukwekweDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tariro MapurangaDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Kudakwashe TirivanhuDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Dixon ChibandaMental Health Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Jermaine M DambiDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extensive benefits of physical activity (PA) are well known. However, PA participation among pregnant women remains low. This study evaluated PA levels and associated factors, including barriers and facilitators in pregnant women in Harare, Zimbabwe. This cross-sectional study recruited 517 pregnant women receiving antenatal care across ten primary healthcare clinics. Data were collected using the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ), Exercise Benefits and Barriers Scale (EBBS) and EQ-5D-5L. We used descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression for analyses. The mean age of the study participants was 26.1 (±5.9) years. 89% of the pregnant women did not meet the WHO recommendations of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity PA. For women who were active, most engaged in moderate intensity (41.9%) PA and household activity (51.1%). The most perceived barriers and facilitators to PA were reported as exercise environment and life enhancement, respectively. Lower education (AOR 5.24 [1.69: 16.19]), multigravida (AOR .47 [.31: .42]), not exercising pre-pregnancy (AOR 2.02 [1.30: 3.13]), perceived decreased current PA level (AOR 2.04 [1.22: 3.43]) and not being advised by a doctor on exercise (AOR 2.05 [1.04: 4.04]) were associated with physical inactivity. Physical inactivity is endemic among Zimbabwean pregnant women, there is a need for bespoke and contextualized interventions. Implementing supervised and group-based antenatal exercise classes must be considered.

Identifiers

PMID39761263
PMCPMC11703015

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.