SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Effectiveness of carbon dioxide cryotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retraction: Effectiveness of carbon dioxide cryotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Cutaneous and Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis: Perspectives on Immunity, Virulence, and Treatment.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Synergistic COInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCutaneous leishmaniasis is one of the neglected tropical diseases which is hard to treat. Carbon dioxide-based cryotherapy is a novel therapeutic option for cutaneous leishmaniasis in both developed and developing nations. This study aims to summarize the pooled evidence on the effectiveness of carbon dioxide-based cryotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.
methodsSearches of grey literature using Google Scholar and databases including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were conducted to find studies that reported the cure rate of cryotherapy. The search, screening, data extraction, and critical evaluation were carried out by two authors, with a third acting as a tiebreaker. To locate papers, we used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) phrases and keywords. Between May 10 and May 13, 2023, the review protocol was developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist. For the meta-analysis, STATA 17 was the statistical software used. The random effects model was employed to compile the effect estimates. Lastly, we used the funnel plot and Egger's test to evaluate publication bias, heterogeneity, sensitivity, and subgroup analyses.
resultOut of the 16 researches included in the review, seven papers with a total of 1,357 cases were chosen for the meta-analysis. For the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis, the pooled cure rate with carbon dioxide-based cryotherapy was 87.84% (95% CI: 65.92-109.77). Randomized controlled trials made up the majority of the studies that were used. The highest cure rate was seen when there were two lesions, 94.34% (95% CI:68.21-119.48), and when the size of the lesion was less than or equal to 4, 93.83% (95% CI:68.92-118.75). There was no indication of a significant publishing bias.
conclusionCarbon dioxide-based cryotherapy revealed a high pooled efficacy. The efficacy of the CL instances was mostly dependent on the extent of the lesion and the frequency of therapy administration. To determine if this therapy is beneficial in a routine care context, a large-scale study with a sound design is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.