ArticleRMD open2025
Burden of coronary artery calcification in ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Article in RMD open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms, clinical manifestations and management of cardiovascular diseases in ANCA-associated vasculitis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Clinical and Echocardiographic Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). Screening and primary cardiovascular prevention may improve outcomes.
methodsWe identified patients in the 2002-2019 Mass General Brigham AAV cohort with thoracic CT scans obtained for other clinical purposes. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores and age, sex and race-standardised CAC percentiles were calculated. Quantile regression was used to identify differences by ANCA type, and Gray's test examined differences in major adverse cardiac events by CAC score.
resultsOf 175 included patients, 127 (73%) were MPO-ANCA+and 48 (27%) were PR3-ANCA+. The median CAC score was 17 (IQR 0, 334) and CAC percentile was 45 (IQR 0, 78); 65 (39%) patients had CAC of ≥100. The total CAC score was higher in patients with MPO-ANCA+AAV vs PR3-ANCA+AAV (median 24 vs 1, p=0.003), as was the standardised CAC percentile (50th vs 34th, p=0.02). Of 116 (66%) patients with non-zero CAC scores, only 29 (25%) were on a statin. In a time-to-event analysis, CAC of 100 or higher trended towards association with higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (χ
conclusionA majority of patients with AAV had clinically significant CAC. There were differences in CAC burden among those with MPO-ANCA+AAV versus PR3-ANCA+AAV. Although CAC is associated with CVD risk and an indication for statins, the use was inconsistent. The role of CT imaging to screen for CVD and guide primary prevention in AAV requires further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.