ArticleScientific reports2025
Association between low fasting glucose of the living donor and risk of graft loss in the recipient after liver transplantation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several donor-specific factors influence the functional recovery and long-term outcomes of liver grafts. This study investigated the association between donor fasting glucose (DFG) and recipient outcomes after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in 950 cases at a single center. Patients were divided into two groups: low-DFG (< 85 mg/dL, n = 120) and control (≥ 85 mg/dL, n = 830). The five-year graft survival rate was significantly lower in the low-DFG group (71.5%) compared to the control group (80.0%) (P = 0.02). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that low DFG was independently associated with graft loss (hazard ratio 1.72, 95% CI 1.15-2.56, P = 0.008). In propensity score-matched groups, the low-DFG group also had lower survival rates (71% vs. 83.1%, P = 0.004). The presence of additional risk factors, such as low graft-to-recipient weight ratio, older donor age, and longer cold ischemic time, further reduced graft survival in the low-DFG group. A DFG level < 85 mg/dL is associated with higher risk of graft failure after LDLT, especially when combined with other risk factors. Low DFG should be considered a prognostic marker in LDLT planning, with potential to improve patient outcomes as further research clarifies the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.