Evidence mapPaperPMID 39762352Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

Umbrella review of social inequality in digital interventions targeting dietary and physical activity behaviors.

Laura M König, Max J Western, Andrea H Denton, Rebecca A Krukowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Inequalities in Exclusively Mobile Interventions Targeting Weight-Related Behaviors: Systematic Review of Observational Studies.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Identifying Social Media-Based Interactions That Help Adults to Adhere to Weight Loss Goals: A Systematic Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. A Scoping Review of the Mechanisms Influencing Socioeconomic Disparities in Outcomes of Digital Interventions for Weight-Related Behaviors.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura M KönigFaculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. laura.koenig@univie.ac.at.
Max J WesternDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Andrea H DentonClaude Moore Health Sciences Library, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Rebecca A KrukowskiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Funding

Addressing Rural Health Disparities by Optimizing "High Touch" Intervention Components in Digital Obesity TreatmentR01DK135227 · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · 2025 to 2025
$602k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK135227NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK135227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital interventions are increasingly utilized as a lever to promote population health, yet not everyone may equally benefit from them. This umbrella review pooled the insights from available systematic and scoping reviews regarding potential social inequalities in digital intervention uptake, engagement and effectiveness, focusing on the promotion of weight-related behaviors (diet, physical activity, sedentary behavior) and weight loss (maintenance) in adults. Six databases were searched from 1970 to October 2023. Forty-six reviews were included, of which most focused on physical activity and intervention effectiveness. Age and gender/ sex differences were most frequently studied. Most reviews found digital interventions to be effective irrespective of age, while men benefitted more from digital interventions than women. Other inequality indicators (e.g., income, education) were rarely studied, despite them being potential causes of a digital divide. A more systematic and thorough exploration of inequalities in digital health is required to promote health for all.

Identifiers

PMID39762352
PMCPMC11704356

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.