ArticleScientific reports2025
Associations between the conicity index and kidney stone disease prevalence and mortality in American adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comparison of the association and discriminatory ability of CVAI, LAP, CI, and AVI for type 2 diabetes in Chinese adults aged ≥ 50 years: a sex-specific analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Association between conicity index and gallstone disease: A cross-sectional study from NHANES 2017-2020.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Association between conicity index and frailty in older Americans: the NHANES cross-sectional study, 2007-2018.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Investigation of the predictive value of Hounsfield units in predicting stone culture results in urinary stone disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative assessment of the effects of dotinurad and febuxostat on the renal function in chronic kidney disease patients with hyperuricemia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Associations between eight anthropometric indices and Parkinson's disease: a nationwide population-based study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Kidney Stone Disease (KSD) is a prevalent urological condition, while abdominal obesity is on the rise globally. The conicity index, measuring body fat distribution, is crucial but under-researched in its relation to KSD and all-cause mortality. This study, using data from 59,842 participants in the NHANES (2007-2018), calculated the conicity index from waist circumference, height, and weight. Logistic regression and Cox models revealed a significant positive correlation: each 0.1 unit increase in the conicity index was linked to a 23% rise in KSD odds (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.35) and higher predictive ability compared to traditional measures (AUC = 0.619). In KSD patients, this increase corresponded to a 44% higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.82), and in non-KSD patients, a 53% increase (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.37, 1.70). Serum albumin and Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) partially mediated these relationships. Addressing central obesity could significantly lower the risks of KSD and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.