SynthesisBMC health services research2025
The influence of electronic health record design on usability and medication safety: systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Electronic health records: managerial insights from an umbrella review.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Electronic health record adaptation and innovation among healthcare professionals in hospitals: an integrative framework based on a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- User Experiences of Electronic Controlled Substance Surveillance Among Health Care Professionals in a Large Academic Hospital: Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Maternal Vulnerability Indicators Derived from Free-Text Clinical Documentation in Adolescent Pregnancy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Medication-related examination questions in clinical courses within undergraduate medical education.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Multicenter Usability Evaluation and Co-Development of a Digital Decision-Support Tool for Labor Triage: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Comparative Usability Evaluation of Two Hospital Information Systems: A Mixed-Methods Study in an Iranian Teaching Hospital.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals, Patients and Family Members on Managing Regular Medications Across the Perioperative Pathway: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Validating large language model-assisted data extraction from clinical notes.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- The relationship between self-awareness skills of healthcare workers and healthcare data quality: a cross-sectional study in Tanzanian regional referral hospitals.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Beyond the report: a qualitative exploration of safety incidents in maternity services.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Expert Views on Criteria for Evaluation of Human Factors Methods: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Person-centered hospital care in Indonesia: the role of digital health competency, user interface quality, and user experience in a multi-hospital study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Perceived Usability of Zoom™ for a Single-Session Telehealth Fall-Risk Screening in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.International journal of telerehabilitation · 2026Article
- Review
- Accurate Clinical Entity Recognition and Code Mapping of Anatomopathological Reports Using BioClinicalBERT Enhanced by Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Criteria and Protocol: Assessing Generative AI Efficacy in Perceiving EULAR 2019 Lupus Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- 'Making the System Work': A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Dietitians' Use of iEMR to Support Nutrition Care Transitions for Older Adults with Malnutrition.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessing Medication CDS Usability: Pilot Results from 10 Outpatient Clinics.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Usability Challenges in Electronic Health Records: Impact on Documentation Burden and Clinical Workflow: A Scoping Review.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe advantages of electronic health records (EHRs) are well-documented regarding the process of care, enhanced data accessibility and cost savings. However, EHR design can also contribute to usability challenges, with poorly designed EHRs being implicated in user errors including patient overdoses. Our study seeks to evaluate how EHR design influences both usability and medication safety.
methodsA systematic review was conducted of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and the ACM library from 1 January 2009 to 8 October 2024. Eligible studies reported on the impact of specific EHR design elements on usability and/or medication safety, involved healthcare providers and took place in a secondary, tertiary or quaternary care setting. Usability was defined as the extent to which an EHR can be used to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction, while medication safety related to the risk of drug-related problems, including adverse drug events and medication errors. Design features identified within studies were validated, by cross-referencing these elements with ISO standards regarding design recommendations. A narrative synthesis was conducted, with studies tabulated based on whether they assessed usability and/or medication safety. Patterns were identified and common design elements between studies translated into themes. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate study quality and PRISMA guidelines were followed throughout.
resultsThirty-two studies were identified. The design features described in these studies fit within seven broad design themes: searchability, automation, customisation, data entry, workflow, user guidance and interoperability. EHR systems that prioritised these areas were associated with higher reported usability and enhanced medication safety, while the opposite was found for systems that overlooked these design aspects. Our review also highlighted the numerous ways these themes can be implemented, while identifying the contributing factors that enable their successful implementation.
conclusionThe design of EHRs can enhance or undermine usability and medication safety, depending on the searchability and customisability of these systems, how data entry processes and provider workflow are facilitated and how automation, user guidance and interoperability are implemented. Future EHR evaluations should be performed throughout the design process and consensus building is required regarding what exactly constitutes a design element, within an EHR context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.