Evidence mapPaperPMID 39762900Full record

ArticleBiomarker research2025

Global, regional, and national burden of esophageal cancer: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.

Weiqiu Jin, Kaichen Huang, Ziyin Ding, Mengwei Zhang, Chongwu Li, Zheng Yuan, Ke Ma, Xiaodan Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomarker research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Clinical predictors of early reflux and symptom severity after esophagectomy: a risk prediction tool.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026
    Article
  9. [A two-stage model for predicting postoperative pulmonary infection in esophageal cancer patients].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weiqiu Jin *Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Kaichen Huang *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Ziyin DingCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Women and Children's Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315012, China.
Mengwei ZhangDepartment of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Chongwu LiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Zheng YuanDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China. yuanzheng0404@163.com.
Ke MaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China. echoeach2004@163.com.
Xiaodan YeDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China. yuanyxd@163.com.

Funding

National Science Foundation of China 82071990National Science Foundation of China 82271989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveEsophageal cancer (EC) is the seventh most prevalent cancer globally and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality. This study aimed to provide an updated stratified assessment of rates in EC incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) from 1990 to 2021 by sex, age, and Socio-demographic Index (SDI) at global, regional, and national levels, as well as to project the future trends of EC both globally and regionally.

methodsData about age-standardized rates (ASRs) of incidence (ASIR), mortality (ASDR), probability of death (ASPoD) and DALYs (ASDALYRs) of EC were obtained from the 2021 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study. Estimated annual percentage changes (EAPCs) and average annual percentage changes (AAPC) were calculated over certain periods to describe the temporal trends of EC burdens. The analyses were disaggregated by sexes, GBD super-regions and regions, nations/territories, age-groups, and SDI quintiles. A Bayesian age-period-cohort (BAPC) model was constructed to project the global and regional EC ASRs in 2022-2035.

resultsDespite global reductions in EC ASRs, with ASIR, ASDR, and ASDALYR in 2021 of 6.65 [5.88, 7.45] (95% uncertainty interval), 6.25 [5.53, 7.00], and 148.56 [131.71, 166.82], decreasing by 24.9%, 30.7%, and 36.9% in 1990-2021, respectively, the absolute burden numbers were increased from 1990 to 2021, probably because of population growth and aging. Global newly diagnosed cases, deaths, and DALYs of EC increased to 576,529 [509,492, 645,648], 356,263 [319,363, 390,154], and 12,999,265 [11,522,861, 14,605,268] in 2021, by 62.53%, 51.18%, and 33.28% compared to records in 1990. The geographical pattern of EC was consistent: locations with the highest EC incidence and mortality rates were predominantly located in the Asian Esophageal Cancer Belt and African Esophageal Cancer Corridor, with East Asia, Southern Sub-Saharan Africa, and Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa as the GBD regions with the heaviest EC burdens, and Malawi, Eswatini, Mongolia, Zambia, and Zimbabwe with the most EC ASRs in 2021. However, owing to the population size, China, India, the United States, Japan, and Brazil had the heaviest absolute EC burdens. More pronounced alleviations of ASRs were observed in locations with high SDI levels, indicated by their lower AAPC values compared to those of low-SDI locations, while Sub-Saharan Africa regions had increasing EC ASRs, especially in Chad (114.76% in ASDR, for example), Sao Tome and Principe (97.93%), Togo (92.53%), Northern Mariana Islands (84.32%), Liberia (82.33%), etc. Smoking remained the leading contributor to EC ASDALYR globally and across most GBD super-regions in 2021. The EC burden is significantly heavier for males, with incidence and mortality in males in 2021 being 2.89 and 2.88 times higher, respectively, than in females. Across all age groups, EC posed an increasingly significant threat to men aged > 75 years. From 2022 to 2035, the ASR projections show only modest decrease in both global and regional EC burdens, and the absolute burden numbers are expected to increase globally and in nearly all GBD super-regions.

conclusionEC burden remains significant, with disparities across sexes, age groups, and regions. Region-specific and age-targeted measures are crucial to addressing these inequalities, especially in light of increasing EC burdens in older men and in African regions. Efforts should be taken in finding more solid attributions to risk factors for EC burdens and to better identify high-risk populations to inform targeted prevention and screening, and ultimately reduce the EC burden in an efficient and cost-effective way.

Indexed as

Disability-adjusted life yearsEsophageal cancerGlobal Burden of DiseaseIncidence

Identifiers

PMID39762900
PMCPMC11702276

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.