Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39762955›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025

Implementation research logic model in the design and execution of eHealth innovations for maternal and newborn healthcare in Ethiopia.

Dabere Nigatu, Muluken Azage, Eyaya Misgan, Daniel A Enquobahrie, Tegegn Kebebaw, Enyew Abate, Esubalew Alemneh, Mirkuzie Woldie, Tsinuel Girma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Digital Health Innovation by Design: A Logic Model Scaffold for Rural, Regional, and Remote Settings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dabere NigatuDepartment of Reproductive Health and Population Studies, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. daberen@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7303-6723
Muluken AzageSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Eyaya MisganSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Daniel A EnquobahrieDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Tegegn KebebawICT4D Research Center, Bahir Dar Institute of Technology, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Enyew AbateSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Esubalew AlemnehICT4D Research Center, Bahir Dar Institute of Technology, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Mirkuzie WoldieDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Tsinuel GirmaSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of eHealth innovations is becoming increasingly important in improving health outcomes, especially for maternal and newborn health. However, planning and executing these innovations can be challenging due to their complex nature. To provide guidance and clarity on implementation approaches, researchers need to use implementation research (IR) tools. We conducted IR to recognize the challenges in implementing eHealth innovations in the context of maternal and newborn healthcare using the implementation research logic model (IRLM). Therefore, this paper aims to describe the practical application of IRLM to design, execute and evaluate eHealth innovations that improve maternal and newborn care in public facilities in Ethiopia.

methodsWe employed rapid review, formative assessment and process evaluation of an eHealth innovation in selected healthcare facilities serving maternal and newborn care. The eHealth innovation we developed and deployed was named 'ADHERE' (Antenatal Care, ChilDbirtH CarE and Postnatal CaRE), representing the continuum of maternal care. The rapid review was conducted as an initial step using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We employed a mix of data collection methods: interview/discussion, eHealth system or document review and direct observation. Furthermore, we executed various stakeholder engagement activities: two co-creation workshops and on-site iterative discussions. We applied the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) to capture ongoing implementation learnings.

resultsWe developed IRLM of the eHealth innovation implementation for three contexts: urban, peri-urban and remote public healthcare facilities. The model depicted the mechanism of interaction between implementation determinants and implementation strategies to produce the intended implementation outcomes. The IRLM helped to identify more than 35 implementation barriers or facilitators for eHealth interventions and to develop over 17 mitigation strategies for the study contexts. The initial IRLM was refined through ongoing implementation learnings and the mitigation strategies that were executed.

conclusionsThe IRLM is a comprehensive and effective guiding tool for the development, implementation and evaluation of innovations in various low- and middle-income contexts. Researchers and implementing partners should adapt and use it.

Indexed as

Implementation ScienceMaternal Health ServicesTelemedicineEthiopiaFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansInfant HealthInfant, NewbornMaternal-Child Health ServicesPostnatal CarePregnancyPrenatal CareStakeholder ParticipationeHealtheHealth innovationEthiopiaImplementation research logic modelImplementation scienceImplementation strategiesMaternal healthcareNewborn healthcare

Identifiers

PMID39762955
PMCPMC11702162

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.