Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39763004›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Developing archetypes for key roles in a pragmatic trial: implementing human-centered design to promote advance care planning in primary care.

Martha Abshire Saylor, Danny Scerpella, Margo Chapin, Anushka Jajodia, Amrutha J Kadali, Jessica L Colburn, Valerie Cotter, Jennifer L Wolff

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04819191 (Improving Communication for Primary Care Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04819191 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Communication for Primary Care Patients (SHARING Choices)

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled64,915ConditionsAdvance Care Planning, DementiaArmsSHARING Choices
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martha Abshire SaylorJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205P, USA. mabshir1@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1824-1542
Danny ScerpellaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Margo ChapinJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Anushka JajodiaJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205P, USA.
Amrutha J KadaliJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jessica L ColburnJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Valerie CotterJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205P, USA.
Jennifer L WolffJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

The Johns Hopkins Clinical Research Scholars in Women's Health (BIRCWH)K12HD085845 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2015 to 2023
$4.5M
PRAGMATIC TRIAL TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION FOR PRIMARY CARE PATIENTS WITH ADRDR33AG061882 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DY, SYDNEY MORSS, WOLFF, JENNIFER L. · 2020 to 2022
$3.8M
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development K12HD085845NIA NIH HHS R33 AG061882NIA NIH HHS R33AG061882NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD085845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArchetypes are representations of a group of people with shared behaviors, attitudes, and characteristics. The design and use of archetypes have potential application to increase partnership and support when embedding and scaling interventions but methodological approaches have not been developed.

objectiveTo describe the methodology of designing archetypes for use in a pragmatic trial of advance care planning in the primary care context, SHARING Choices ((NCT04819191). We present resulting archetypes representing three key roles (primary care champion, advance care planning facilitator, and patient) in our pragmatic trial.

methodsOur process for developing archetypes involved 4 steps: 1) Identify roles for archetype development, 2) Identify Shareholders and Data Sources for Archetype Development, 3) Generate unique archetypes and their distinguishing traits, and 4) Iteratively refine archetypes through exposure, scrutiny, and shareholder input. We also developed a process map to communicate our methodology.

resultsWe created 6 distinct archetypes for the primary care champion role, 5 archetypes for the advance care planning facilitator role and 6 archetypes for the patient role. For each archetype we described strengths, challenges, prevailing emotions, and successful approaches to collaboration (e.g., "what works for me"). Unique opportunities for synergy between archetypes (such as with facilitator and champion) and potential challenges between archetypes (such as for facilitator and patient) suggest ways to improve training and support of key roles. DISCUSSION: Our process for creating archetypes for use in implementation research was iterative and informative in discussion of implementation with shareholders. We expect this methodology to be useful for anticipating and analyzing many aspects of implementation.

Indexed as

Advance care planningArchetypesHuman-centered designMethodology

Identifiers

PMID39763004
PMCPMC11705709

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.