ArticleJournal of oral microbiology2025
Differences in oral microbiota associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus between the Dai and Han populations.
Article in Journal of oral microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advances in the study of oral microbiota in association with T2DM: a systematic review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Oral‑gut axis in systemic disease: A barrier‑metabolism‑immunity three‑dimensional regulatory model (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Oral Microbiota and Type 2 Diabetes: Interactions, Potential Mechanisms, and Preventive Strategies.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Oral Microbiome in Indian Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Periodontitis Cohorts.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Microbiota in Patients with Diabetes and Systemically Healthy Individuals: A Pilot Next-Generation Sequencing Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) development is closely linked to microbiota, influenced by geography, ethnicity, gender, and age. While the relationship between oral microbiota and T2DM has been explored, specific microbiota associated with T2DM in the Dai and Han populations remains unclear. This study aims to compare oral microbiota differences and identify keystone species between these populations, both with and without T2DM. Methods: We recruited 28 han participants (6 healthy children, 10 healthy adults, 12 adults with T2DM) and 34 Dai participants (11 healthy children, 10 healthy adults, 13 adults with T2DM). Blood samples were collected for biochemical analysis, and saliva samples underwent DNA extraction and 16S rRNA sequencing. Results: Age significantly influenced oral microbiota differences between the Dai and Han populations, overshadowing the effects of diabetes. In the Dai population with T2DM, notable increases in Conclusion: This is the first comparative analysis of oral microbiota in the Dai and Han populations with T2DM, highlighting age and ethnicity's influence on microbial composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.