ArticleHealth science reports2025
Efficacy of Intravenous Versus Oral Administration of Levocarnitine in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Therapeutic Approaches to Renal Anemia.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05817799 (Impact of Hemodialysis on Plasma Carnitine Levels in Patients With End Stage Renal Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Hemodialysis on Plasma Carnitine Levels in Patients With End Stage Renal Disease
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomized Clinical Trial for the Optimization of Dyslipidemia Management in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing In-Hospital Maintenance Hemodialysis Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Analysis of factors influencing hemoglobin target achievement in maintenance hemodialysis patients in Wuhan, China.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Carnitine deficiency contributes to various comorbidities in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. This study aims to assess the impact of levocarnitine supplementation on hematological and serum iron profile parameters, comparing the efficacy of oral versus intravenous (IV) administration in these patients. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial was conducted on patients undergoing MHD at the hemodialysis unit of our study center in Karachi, Pakistan. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to either the oral or IV groups. Patients in the oral group received levocarnitine tablets of 500 mg three times daily, while patients in the IV group received an IV bolus of levocarnitine at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight, infused over 2-3 min directly into the IV line after each hemodialysis session. Both groups received intervention for a total of 24 weeks, and the final analysis included 49 patients from the oral group and 34 patients from the IV group. Results: The study involved 83 patients with a mean age of 44.72 ± 8.77 years, with a balanced distribution of 41 males and 42 females. The IV group showed a significant improvement in hemoglobin levels (mean increase: 0.57 g/dL, Conclusion: levocarnitine improves the hematological and iron profile in MHD patients. However, IV levocarnitine significantly more effective than oral administration. It notably improves hemoglobin, and enhances iron profile parameters. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05817799.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.