Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39763788›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Dissociating Contributions of Theta and Alpha Oscillations from Aperiodic Neural Activity in Human Visual Working Memory.

Quirine van Engen, Geeling Chau, Aaron Smith, Kirsten Adam, Thomas Donoghue, Bradley Voytek

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Quirine van EngenORCID 0000-0002-7488-211X
Geeling Chau
Aaron Smith

Funding

Tools for parameterizing and visualizing electrophysiological rhythmic and arrhythmic featuresR01GM134363 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI VOYTEK, BRADLEY T. · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While visual working memory (WM) is strongly associated with reductions in occipitoparietal 8-12 Hz alpha power, the role of 4-7 Hz frontal midline theta power is less clear, with both increases and decreases widely reported. Here, we test the hypothesis that this theta paradox can be explained by non-oscillatory, aperiodic neural activity dynamics. Because traditional time-frequency analyses of electroencephalopgraphy (EEG) data conflate oscillations and aperiodic activity, event-related changes in aperiodic activity can manifest as task-related changes in apparent oscillations, even when none are present. Reanalyzing EEG data from two visual WM experiments (n = 74), and leveraging spectral parameterization, we found systematic changes in aperiodic activity with WM load, and we replicated classic alpha, but not theta, oscillatory effects after controlling for aperiodic changes. Aperiodic activity decreased during WM retention, and further flattened over the occipitoparietal cortex with an increase in WM load. After controlling for these dynamics, aperiodic-adjusted alpha power decreased with increasing WM load. In contrast, aperiodic-adjusted theta power increased during WM retention, but because aperiodic activity reduces more, it falsely appears as though theta "oscillatory" power (e.g., bandpower) is reduced. Furthermore, only a minority of participants (31/74) had a detectable degree of theta oscillations. These results offer a potential resolution to the theta paradox where studies show contrasting power changes. We identify novel aperiodic dynamics during human visual WM that mask the potential role that neural oscillations play in cognition and behavior. Significance statement: Working Memory (WM) is our ability to hold information in mind without it being present in our external environment. Years of research focused on oscillatory brain dynamics to discover the mechanisms of WM. Here, we specifically look at oscillatory and non-oscillatory, aperiodic activity as measured with scalp EEG to test their significance in supporting WM. We challenge earlier findings regarding theta oscillations with our analysis approach, while replicating alpha oscillation findings. Furthermore, aperiodic activity is found to be involved in WM, over frontal regions in a task-general manner, and over anterior regions this activity is reduced with an increase the number of items that are remembered. Thus, we have identified novel aperiodic dynamics during human visual WM.

Identifiers

PMID39763788
PMCPMC11702548

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.