Evidence mapPaperPMID 39763830Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Metabolic Switch in Endocrine Resistant Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer.

Heather M Brechbuhl, Amy Han, Kiran Vinod Paul, Travis Nemkov, Srinivas Ramachandran, Ashley Ward, Britta M Jacobsen, Kirk Hansen, Carol A Sartorius, Angelo D'Alessandro and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Heather M BrechbuhlDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3132-4465
Amy HanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado USA.
Kiran Vinod PaulDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado USA.
Travis NemkovDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado USA.
Srinivas RamachandranDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2929-1377
Ashley WardDepartment of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado USA.
Britta M JacobsenDepartment of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado USA.
Kirk HansenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado USA.
Carol A SartoriusDepartment of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado USA.
Angelo D'AlessandroDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2258-6490
Peter KabosDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1500-471X

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · 1988 to 2025
$33.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934NCI NIH HHS R01 CA205044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The development of endocrine resistance remains a significant challenge in the clinical management of estrogen receptor-positive ( Experimental Design: To address the challenge of metabolic adaptation in anti-endocrine resistance, we generated Tam and Fulv resistance in six ER+ breast cancer ( Results: Tamoxifen-resistant (TamR) and fulvestrant-resistant (FulvR) cells exhibited disrupted TCA cycle activity, reduced glutathione levels, and altered nucleotide and amino acid metabolism. DMF treatment replenished TCA cycle intermediates and reversed resistance in both TamR and FulvR cells. DMF also increased mevalonate pathway enzyme expression in both TamR and FulvR cells, with TamR cells upregulating enzymes in the cholesterol synthesis phase and FulvR enhancing enzymes in the early part of the pathway. DMF restored ER DNA-binding patterns in TamR cells to resemble parental cells, re-sensitizing them to Tam. In FulvR cells, DMF reversed resistance by modulating ER-cofactor interactions but did not restore parental ER DNA-binding signatures. Conclusions: Our findings provide new insights into how metabolic reprogramming affects ER DNA-binding activity in endocrine-resistant breast cancer. We demonstrate how altering metabolism can reprogram ER signaling and influence resistance mechanisms by targeting metabolic vulnerabilities, such as TCA cycle disruptions. Additionally, our data provide a comprehensive metabolomic, RNA-seq, and CUT&RUN data set relevant to tumor metabolic adaptation leading to acquired endocrine resistance in highly utilized ER+ breast cancer cell lines. This study improves our understanding of how metabolic states alter ER function in endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast CancerEndocrine ResistanceEstrogen ReceptorMetabolism

Identifiers

PMID39763830
PMCPMC11703175

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.