Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39764178›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Robust and interpretable AI-guided marker for early dementia prediction in real-world clinical settings.

Liz Yuanxi Lee, Delshad Vaghari, Michael C Burkhart, Peter Tino, Marcella Montagnese, Zhuoyu Li, Katharina Zühlsdorff, Joseph Giorgio, Guy Williams, Eddie Chong and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Enhancing early Alzheimer's disease clinical trials through prognostic score covariate adjustment.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advancing global dementia research through equity and inclusion.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Solving the 'Goldilocks problem' in dementia clinical trials with multimodal AI.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Liz Yuanxi LeeDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Delshad VaghariDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Michael C BurkhartDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Peter TinoSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Marcella MontagneseDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Zhuoyu LiDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Katharina ZühlsdorffDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Joseph GiorgioHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Guy WilliamsWolfson Brain Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Eddie ChongMemory, Aging, and Cognition Center, Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Christopher ChenMemory, Aging, and Cognition Center, Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Benjamin R UnderwoodDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, United Kingdom.
Timothy RittmanDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Zoe KourtziDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.

Funding

Project 1U19AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI MONICA G. RIVERA-MINDT · 2016 to 2026
$226.7M
NIA NIH HHS U19 AG024904Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Predicting dementia early has major implications for clinical management and patient outcomes. Yet, we still lack sensitive tools for stratifying patients early, resulting in patients being undiagnosed or wrongly diagnosed. Despite rapid expansion in machine learning models for dementia prediction, limited model interpretability and generalizability impede translation to the clinic. Methods: We build a robust and interpretable predictive prognostic model (PPM) and validate its clinical utility using real-world, routinely-collected, non-invasive, and low-cost (cognitive tests, structural MRI) patient data. To enhance scalability and generalizability to the clinic, we: 1) train the PPM with clinically-relevant predictors (cognitive tests, grey matter atrophy) that are common across research and clinical cohorts, 2) test PPM predictions with independent multicenter real-world data from memory clinics across countries (UK, Singapore). Findings: PPM robustly predicts (accuracy: 81.66%, AUC: 0.84, sensitivity: 82.38%, specificity: 80.94%) whether patients at early disease stages (MCI) will remain stable or progress to Alzheimer's Disease (AD). PPM generalizes from research to real-world patient data across memory clinics and its predictions are validated against longitudinal clinical outcomes. PPM allows us to derive an individualized AI-guided multimodal marker (i.e. predictive prognostic index) that predicts progression to AD more precisely than standard clinical markers (grey matter atrophy, cognitive scores; PPM-derived marker: hazard ratio = 3.42, p = 0.01) or clinical diagnosis (PPM-derived marker: hazard ratio = 2.84, p < 0.01), reducing misdiagnosis. Interpretation: Our results provide evidence for a robust and explainable clinical AI-guided marker for early dementia prediction that is validated against longitudinal, multicenter patient data across countries, and has strong potential for adoption in clinical practice. Funding: Wellcome Trust, Royal Society, Alzheimer's Research UK, Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation Diagnostics Accelerator, Alan Turing Institute.

Indexed as

Brain imagingCognitionDementia predictionMachine learningPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39764178
PMCPMC11701481

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.