ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Robust and interpretable AI-guided marker for early dementia prediction in real-world clinical settings.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Multimodal AI for Alzheimer Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review of Datasets, Models, and Modalities.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical prediction models using artificial intelligence approaches in dementia.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Pooled it
- Enhancing early Alzheimer's disease clinical trials through prognostic score covariate adjustment.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- The global research of artificial intelligence on Alzheimer disease: A 25-year bibliometric analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Early-Age onset of psychotic spectrum symptoms is highly prevalent and associated with greater illness severity in schizophrenia spectrum disorders that develop later in life.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026Observational
- Implementing Coordinated Specialty Care Programs for Psychosis Across the U.S.: State-Level Administrator and Provider Perspectives.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Improved polygenic risk prediction for alzheimer's disease and related dementias using deep learning: age and APOE-stratified analysis.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- Resource-stratified machine learning framework for cognitive status classification and mild cognitive impairment to dementia progression prediction.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- Derivation of an intrinsic brain activity biomarker for the earliest prediction of cognitive decline.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advancing global dementia research through equity and inclusion.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Multi-Algorithm R Shiny Application for Predictive Modeling and Analytics: Case Study of Alzheimer Disease Diagnostics.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Solving the 'Goldilocks problem' in dementia clinical trials with multimodal AI.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- From Lesion to Decision: AI for ARIA Detection and Predictive Imaging in Alzheimer's Disease.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- AI-guided patient stratification improves outcomes and efficiency in the AMARANTH Alzheimer's Disease clinical trial.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Uncovering stage-specific neural and molecular progression in Alzheimer's disease: Implications for early screening.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Predicting dementia early has major implications for clinical management and patient outcomes. Yet, we still lack sensitive tools for stratifying patients early, resulting in patients being undiagnosed or wrongly diagnosed. Despite rapid expansion in machine learning models for dementia prediction, limited model interpretability and generalizability impede translation to the clinic. Methods: We build a robust and interpretable predictive prognostic model (PPM) and validate its clinical utility using real-world, routinely-collected, non-invasive, and low-cost (cognitive tests, structural MRI) patient data. To enhance scalability and generalizability to the clinic, we: 1) train the PPM with clinically-relevant predictors (cognitive tests, grey matter atrophy) that are common across research and clinical cohorts, 2) test PPM predictions with independent multicenter real-world data from memory clinics across countries (UK, Singapore). Findings: PPM robustly predicts (accuracy: 81.66%, AUC: 0.84, sensitivity: 82.38%, specificity: 80.94%) whether patients at early disease stages (MCI) will remain stable or progress to Alzheimer's Disease (AD). PPM generalizes from research to real-world patient data across memory clinics and its predictions are validated against longitudinal clinical outcomes. PPM allows us to derive an individualized AI-guided multimodal marker (i.e. predictive prognostic index) that predicts progression to AD more precisely than standard clinical markers (grey matter atrophy, cognitive scores; PPM-derived marker: hazard ratio = 3.42, p = 0.01) or clinical diagnosis (PPM-derived marker: hazard ratio = 2.84, p < 0.01), reducing misdiagnosis. Interpretation: Our results provide evidence for a robust and explainable clinical AI-guided marker for early dementia prediction that is validated against longitudinal, multicenter patient data across countries, and has strong potential for adoption in clinical practice. Funding: Wellcome Trust, Royal Society, Alzheimer's Research UK, Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation Diagnostics Accelerator, Alan Turing Institute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.