ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Gender and activity disparities in the relationship between circadian syndrome and gallstone disease.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Serum lipids, oxidative stress, and systemic inflammation mediate the association between circadian syndrome and periodontitis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the potential correlation between gallstone disease (GSD) prevalence and circadian syndrome (CircS). Methods: The cross-sectional research utilized data spanning 2017 to March 2020, sourced from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The GSD data were collected via questionnaires, with appropriate sample weights applied to ensure the study population was representative. Three multivariable logistic regression models were built to clarify the connection between CircS and GSD. Furthermore, subgroup analysis and interaction test were carried out, categorized based on demographic traits and lifestyle aspects, to discern the potential influence of these variables on the correlation. Results: The analysis included 4,126 participants, with a prevalence of 38.68% for CircS and 12.04% for GSD. The multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated a positive correlation between CircS and the prevalence of GSD (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.336, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.048, 1.702). When stratified by the number of CircS components, a positive correlation was observed between the number of CircS components and the prevalence of GSD (P for trend < 0.05). In particular, individuals with six or more CircS components had a higher prevalence of GSD than those with three or fewer components (OR = 2.608, 95% CI: 1.464, 4.647). The subgroup analysis and interaction test revealed that a positive correlation between CircS and GSD prevalence was mainly observed in female individuals (OR = 1.701, 95% CI: 1.236, 2.341) and individuals not engaged in moderate activity (OR = 1.990, 95% CI: 1.158, 3.418). Conclusion: There is a positive correlation between CircS and GSD prevalence, particularly among females and individuals not engaging in moderate activity. These findings offer new insights for research directions in GSD and may impact preventive and therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.