SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Prevalence and risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of adiponectin in gestational diabetes mellitus: advances in mechanistic insights and early predictive potential.Adipocyte · 2026Review
- Prognostic biomarkers of future diabetes in South Asian women diagnosed with gestational diabetes: a prospective cohort study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- Breastfeeding among contemporary Australian populations and 2025 national targets: a scoping review of current data and implications for policy and practice.International breastfeeding journal · 2026Article
- Risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus and postpartum glucose intolerance: a retrospective study from a hospital specializing in infertility treatment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anxiety, depression, eating behaviors, and irrational food beliefs as predictors of type 2 diabetes risk in Honduran adults.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Factors influencing type 2 diabetes in adults: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Acute Coronary Syndrome: Considerations Regarding Pregnancy [Letter].International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to explore the risk factors in the progression of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Material and methods: Relevant studies were comprehensively searched from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase up to March 12. Data extraction was performed. Differences in risk factors were presented as odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The quality of the included studies was assessed through the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality scale. Results: This meta-analysis encompassed 46 studies involving a total of 196,494 patients. The factors most strongly associated with the risk of developing T2DM following GDM were the use of progestin-only contraceptives (odds ratio [OR]: 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-4.45, P = 0.049), recurrence of GDM (OR: 2.63, 95% CI = 1.88-3.69, P < 0.001), insulin use during pregnancy (OR: 4.35, 95% CI = 3.17-5.96, P < 0.001), pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) (OR: 2.97, 95% CI = 2.16-4.07, P < 0.001), BMI after delivery (OR: 4.17, 95% CI = 2.58-6.74, P < 0.001), macrosomia (OR: 3.30, 95% CI = 1.45-7.49, P = 0.04), hypertension (OR: 5.19, 95% CI = 1.31-20.51, P = 0.019), and HbA1c levels (OR: 3.32, 95% CI = 1.81-6.11, P < 0.001). Additionally, age (OR: 1.71, 95% CI = 1.23-2.38, P = 0.001), family history of diabetes (OR: 1.47, 95% CI = 1.27-1.70, P < 0.001), BMI during pregnancy (OR: 1.06, 95% CI = 1.00-1.12, P = 0.056), fasting blood glucose (FBG) (OR: 1.58, 95% CI = 1.36-1.84, P < 0.001), 1-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (OR: 1.38, 95% CI = 1.02-1.87, P = 0.037), and 2-hour OGTT (OR: 1.54, 95% CI = 1.28-1.58, P < 0.001) were identified as moderate-risk factors for the development of T2DM. Conclusion: The systematic review and meta-analysis identified several moderate- to high-risk factors associated with the progression of T2DM in individuals with a history of GDM. These risk factors include the use of progestin-only contraceptives, pre-pregnancy BMI, BMI after delivery, macrosomia, hypertension, persistently elevated levels of HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG), 1-hour and 2-hour oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT), age, and family history of diabetes. Our findings serve as evidence for the early prevention and clinical intervention of the progression from GDM to T2DM and offer valuable insights to guide healthcare professionals in formulating customized management and treatment strategies for female patients with diverse forms of GDM. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024545200.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.