Evidence mapPaperPMID 39765242Full record

ArticleNeurospine2024

National Trends in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Stenosis Treated With Fusion Versus Decompression.

Jacob R Ball, Matthew C Gallo, Kareem Kebaish, Nicole Hang, Andy Ton, Fergui Hernandez, Marc Abdou, William J Karakash, Jeffrey C Wang, Raymond J Hah and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jacob R BallDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Matthew C GalloDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kareem KebaishDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nicole HangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Andy TonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Fergui HernandezDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Marc AbdouDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
William J KarakashDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeffrey C WangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Raymond J HahDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ram K AlluriDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to describe utilization, demographics, complications, and revisions for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) with stenosis undergoing decompression or decompression with fusion in the United States.

methodsA national insurance database was used to identify patients who underwent either decompression and fusion or decompression alone for management of DS from 2010-2022. Utilization trends, demographics, and complications for each procedure were compared.

resultsA total of 162,878 patients were identified, of which 78,043 patients underwent combined single-level lumbar decompression and fusion and 84,835 underwent single-level lumbar decompression alone. Between 2010-2021, lumbar decompression and fusion became the predominant surgical intervention for DS in 2016 and continued to account for more than half of all procedures during the remainder of the study period. Factors such as age, sex, comorbidities, geographic region, and physician specialty training were associated with procedure choice. Decompression with fusion was associated with a lower risk of revision surgery up to 5 years postoperatively and an overall lower incidence of 30-day complications.

conclusionDecompression with fusion has become the most common treatment for lumbar DS over the past decade despite a lack of compelling evidence supporting its use compared to decompression alone. A variety of patient and surgeon-specific factors is associated with procedure choice. After accounting for cofounders, we identified treatment-specific complications that may be valuable when counseling patients.

Indexed as

DecompressionDegenerative spondylolisthesisFusionLumbar spine

Identifiers

PMID39765242
PMCPMC11744538

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.