ReviewBiology2024
Oocytes Quality Assessment-The Current Insight: A Systematic Review.
Review in Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vitro fertilization outcomes in previously cured tuberculosis patients: a retrospective study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Spindle-to-oocyte light retardance ratio as a noninvasive biomarker for oocyte quality assessment: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- A Comparative Analysis ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative Assessment of Morphometry, Morphology, and Maturation Capacity of Vitrified Cattle Oocytes in Different Media.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Rescue-In Vitro-Maturation (r-IVM) Outcomes in Women with Diminished Ovarian Reserve (DOR) Versus Normal Ovarian Reserve (NOR).Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An overall in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome is dynamic. Good oocyte quality is important for achieving a better IVF pregnancy. Various methods have been used for OQ assessment (OQA). However, due to inconclusive evidence, one method's superiority has not been proposed over others. Thus, OQA should be consolidated based on the current evidence for this matter. Our study aims to summarize the current OQA used and compare their recommended methods. Our results revealed that the optimal OQA for cost-effectiveness and clinical implementation is still via morphological assessment. The current method most opted for is total oocyte scoring. Although other methods-follicular fluid evaluation, mitochondria spindle assessment, or live zona imaging-can be applied with better precision, due to cost, additional tools, and expertise, and they should cater to research purposes and selected centers. Our results added value as a current strategy for optimizing OQA in IVF practice, aiming at cost-effectiveness and reproducibility for better clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.