ArticleCancers2024
Radiomic Consensus Clustering in Glioblastoma and Association with Gene Expression Profiles.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiogenomic landscape of the hallmarks of cancer.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesGlioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary central nervous system tumor with extremely poor prognosis and survival outcomes. Non-invasive methods like radiomic feature extraction, which assess sub-visual imaging features, provide a potentially powerful tool for distinguishing molecular profiles across groups of patients with GBM. Using consensus clustering of MRI-based radiomic features, this study aims to investigate differential gene expression profiles based on radiomic clusters.
methodsPatients from the TCGA and CPTAC datasets (n = 114) were included in this study. Radiomic features including T1, T1 with contrast, T2, and FLAIR MRI sequences were extracted using PyRadiomics. Selected radiomic features were then clustered using ConsensusClusterPlus (k-means base algorithm and Euclidean distance), which iteratively subsamples and clusters 80% of the data to identify stable clusters by calculating the frequency in which each patient is a member of a cluster across iterations. Gene expression data (available for n = 69 patients) was analyzed using differential gene expression (DEG) and gene set enrichment (GSEA) approaches, after batch correction using ComBat-seq.
resultsThree distinct clusters were identified based on the relative consensus matrix and cumulative distribution plots (Cluster 1, n = 25; Cluster 2, n = 46; Cluster 3, n = 43). No significant differences in patient demographic characteristics, MGMT methylation status, tumor location, or overall survival were identified across clusters. Differentially expressed genes were identified in Cluster 1, which have been previously associated with GBM prognosis, recurrence, and treatment sensitivity. GSEA of Cluster 1 showed an enrichment of genes upregulated for immune-related and DNA metabolism pathways and genes downregulated in pathways associated with protein and histone deacetylation. Clusters 2 and 3 exhibited fewer DEGs which failed to reach significance after multiple testing corrections.
conclusionsConsensus clustering of radiomic features revealed unique gene expression profiles in the GBM cohort which likely represent subtle differences in tumor biology and radiosensitivity that are not visually discernible, underscoring the potential of radiomics to serve as a non-invasive alternative for identifying GBM molecular heterogeneity. Further investigation is still required to validate these findings and their clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.