ReviewBiomolecules2024
The Role of Cardiac Troponin and Other Emerging Biomarkers Among Athletes and Beyond: Underlying Mechanisms, Differential Diagnosis, and Guide for Interpretation.
Review in Biomolecules, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resting and Exercise Lactate Dynamics in Heart Failure: Guiding Therapeutic Optimization.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Aptamer-Based Applications in Cardiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cardiac biomarkers in athletes and active individuals: a clinical review of exercise-induced elevations and diagnostic interpretation.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Moderate aerobic exercise improves haematological indices without altering cardio-metabolic enzyme activities in sedentary healthy young adults.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Aptamers-Based Nanosystems for Diagnosis and Therapy of Cardiovascular Diseases: An Updated Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Upregulated haptoglobin in classical monocytes serves as a diagnostic and immunological biomarker in myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional multi-omics study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular (CV) disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, highlighting the necessity of understanding its underlying molecular and pathophysiological pathways. Conversely, physical activity (PA) and exercise are key strategies in reducing CV event risks. Detecting latent CV conditions in apparently healthy individuals, such as athletes, presents a unique challenge. The early identification and treatment of CV disorders are vital for long-term health and patient survival. Cardiac troponin is currently the most commonly used biomarker for assessing CV changes in both athletes and the general population. However, there remains considerable debate surrounding the mechanisms underlying exercise-induced troponin elevations and its release in non-ischemic contexts. Thus, there is a pressing need to identify and implement more sensitive and specific biomarkers for CV disorders in clinical practice. Indeed, research continues to explore reliable biomarkers for evaluating the health of athletes and the effectiveness of physical exercise. It is essential to analyze current evidence on troponin release in non-ischemic conditions, post-strenuous exercise, and the complex biological pathways that influence its detection. Furthermore, this study summarizes current research on cytokines and exosomes, including their physiological roles and their relevance in various CV conditions, especially in athletes. In addition, this paper gives special attention to underlying mechanisms, potential biomarkers, and future perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.